» Articles » PMID: 39743655

Do Instrument Kinematics and the Apical Preparation Limit Influence Canal Disinfection and Bacterial Extrusion?

Abstract

This in vitro research assessed the influence of the instrument kinematics (rotary and reciprocating) and the apical preparation limit on the root canal disinfection and apical bacterial extrusion. After 21 days of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation in 72 mesial root canals of mandibular molars, the root canals were distributed into 2 groups (n = 36) according to the systems used for preparation: ProDesign S and Reciproc. The groups were redistributed according to the limit of apical preparation (n = 11): (a) 1 mm up to the apical foramen (TL-1); (b) at the apical foramen (TL = 0); (c) 1 mm beyond the apical foramen (TL + 1). After preparation, the remaining biofilm adhered to the dentin walls at the apical third was removed by sonication. The aliquots of bacterial suspension released, and the irrigating solution leaked through the apical foramen during preparation were plated for colony-forming units (CFUs) counting. Data were statistically assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 5%). Both systems promoted decontamination of the apical third, regardless the limit of apical preparation (p > 0.05). A larger quantity of bacteria was extruded from the root canals prepared 1 mm beyond the apical foramen, regardless the instrumentation kinematics (p < 0.05). The apical third of the root canal was efficiently decontaminated after preparation, regardless the instrumentation kinematics and the apical limit. However, a larger quantity of bacterial extrusion was observed when preparation was performed beyond the anatomical root canal limits.

References
1.
Card S, Sigurdsson A, Orstavik D, Trope M . The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod. 2002; 28(11):779-83. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200211000-00008. View

2.
Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr J . Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod. 2010; 36(8):1277-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.007. View

3.
Silva E, Teixeira J, Kudsi N, Sassone L, Krebs R, Coutinho-Filho T . Influence of Apical Preparation Size and Working Length on Debris Extrusion. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27(1):28-31. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201600337. View

4.
Cruz Junior J, Coelho M, Kato A, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Fontana C, Rocha D . The Effect of Foraminal Enlargement of Necrotic Teeth with the Reciproc System on Postoperative Pain: A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2015; 42(1):8-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.09.018. View

5.
Borlina S, Souza V, Holland R, Murata S, Gomes-Filho J, Dezan Junior E . Influence of apical foramen widening and sealer on the healing of chronic periapical lesions induced in dogs' teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109(6):932-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.01.028. View