» Articles » PMID: 29364346

Debris Extrusion and Foraminal Deformation Produced by Reciprocating Instruments Made of Thermally Treated NiTi Wires

Overview
Journal J Appl Oral Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2018 Jan 25
PMID 29364346
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris, percentage of foraminal enlargement and apical foramen (AF) deformation that occurred during root canal preparation with different reciprocation systems: Reciproc, WaveOne (M-Wire), and ProDesign R (Shape Memory Technology Wire) at two different working lengths (WLs): 0.0 and 1.0 mm beyond the AF. The AF of 120 root canals in 60 mesial roots of mandibular molars were photographed with stereomicroscope and randomly assigned into four groups: manual, Reciproc (REC), WaveOne (WO), and ProDesign R (PDR); subsequently, they were further subdivided according to the WL (n=15). Teeth were instrumented, coupled to a dual collecting chamber, and then another photograph of each AF was captured. Extrusion was analysed by determining the weight of extruded debris. Each AF diameter was measured in pre- and post-instrumentation images to determine deformation, which was analysed, and afterwards the final format of AFs was classified (circular/oval/deformed). We found no significant differences when analysing each system at different WLs. When considering each WL, REC and WO showed highest extrusion values (P<.05); for AF enlargement, differences were observed only for WO, when it was used beyond the AF; differences were observed among M-Wire groups beyond the AF (P<.05). AF deformation was observed in all groups; PDR showed the lowest AF deformation values at both WLs; M-Wire groups showed 50% strain beyond the AF. Authors concluded that beyond the apical limit, the alloy and taper are important aspects when considering extrusion and deformation.

Citing Articles

Do instrument kinematics and the apical preparation limit influence canal disinfection and bacterial extrusion?.

Goulart T, Prado M, Tieppo G, Fischer B, Schuldt D, Coelho B Odontology. 2025; .

PMID: 39743655 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-01047-4.


Morphological Changes of the Apical Foramen in Curved Root Canals After Use of Different Heat Treated NiTi Rotary Files: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.

Hamid T, Malik A, Kumar A, Hamid S, Anjum S Eur Endod J. 2024; 9(4):425-431.

PMID: 39704632 PMC: 11685520. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2024.78300.


Do the apical limit and diameter of the instrumentation influence the extrusion of sodium hypochlorite solution? A micro-CT study.

Dotto M, Savaris J, Lima C, da Silva E, Garcia L, Bortoluzzi E Odontology. 2024; .

PMID: 39283508 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-01005-0.


Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems.

Ahmad M Int J Dent. 2024; 2024:8367693.

PMID: 39007058 PMC: 11245337. DOI: 10.1155/2024/8367693.


Assessment of Various Reciprocating System in the Extrusion of Debris from Curved Root Canals: An Original Study.

Sharanpriya , Pushpa S, Karuna , Agarwal I, Deshmukh V, Maria R J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023; 15(Suppl 1):S146-S150.

PMID: 37654408 PMC: 10466559. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_441_22.


References
1.
Topcuoglu H, Zan R, Akpek F, Topcuoglu G, Ulusan O, Akti A . Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments. Int Endod J. 2015; 49(12):1183-1187. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12572. View

2.
Silva E, Teixeira J, Kudsi N, Sassone L, Krebs R, Coutinho-Filho T . Influence of Apical Preparation Size and Working Length on Debris Extrusion. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27(1):28-31. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201600337. View

3.
Silva E, Rodrigues C, Vieira V, Belladonna F, De-Deus G, Lopes H . Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue of a new heat-treated reciprocating instrument. Scanning. 2016; 38(6):837-841. DOI: 10.1002/sca.21333. View

4.
Duque J, Vivan R, Cavenago B, Amoroso-Silva P, Bernardes R, Vasconcelos B . Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017; 25(1):27-33. PMC: 5289397. DOI: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0230. View

5.
Pereira E, Viana A, Buono V, Peters O, de Azevedo Bahia M . Behavior of nickel-titanium instruments manufactured with different thermal treatments. J Endod. 2014; 41(1):67-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.005. View