» Articles » PMID: 39738819

Measuring Visual Ability in Linguistically Diverse Populations

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Dec 31
PMID 39738819
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Measurement of object recognition (OR) ability could predict learning and success in real-world settings, and there is hope that it may reduce bias often observed in cognitive tests. Although the measurement of visual OR is not expected to be influenced by the language of participants or the language of instructions, these assumptions remain largely untested. Here, we address the challenges of measuring OR abilities across linguistically diverse populations. In Study 1, we find that English-Spanish bilinguals, when randomly assigned to the English or Spanish version of the novel object memory test (NOMT), exhibit a highly similar overall performance. Study 2 extends this by assessing psychometric equivalence using an approach grounded in item response theory (IRT). We examined whether groups fluent in English or Spanish differed in (a) latent OR ability as assessed by a three-parameter logistic IRT model, and (2) the mapping of observed item responses on the latent OR construct, as assessed by differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. Spanish speakers performed better than English speakers, a difference we suggest is due to motivational differences between groups of vastly different size on the Prolific platform. That we found no substantial DIF between the groups tested in English or Spanish on the NOMT indicates measurement invariance. The feasibility of increasing diversity by combining groups tested in different languages remains unexplored. Adopting this approach could enable visual scientists to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion in their research, and potentially in the broader application of their work in society.

Citing Articles

Measuring visual ability in linguistically diverse populations.

Hooper M, Tomarken A, Gauthier I Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):36.

PMID: 39738819 PMC: 11685244. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02579-x.

References
1.
Draheim C, Mashburn C, Martin J, Engle R . Reaction time in differential and developmental research: A review and commentary on the problems and alternatives. Psychol Bull. 2019; 145(5):508-535. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000192. View

2.
Crump M, McDonnell J, Gureckis T . Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e57410. PMC: 3596391. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. View

3.
Meade A, Wright N . Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory. J Appl Psychol. 2012; 97(5):1016-31. DOI: 10.1037/a0027934. View

4.
Chow J, Palmeri T, Gauthier I . Haptic object recognition based on shape relates to visual object recognition ability. Psychol Res. 2021; 86(4):1262-1273. PMC: 8341045. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01560-z. View

5.
Jones R, Manly J, Langa K, Ryan L, Levine D, McCammon R . Factor structure of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol neuropsychological battery in the Health and Retirement Study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023; 30(1):47-55. PMC: 10787803. DOI: 10.1017/S135561772300019X. View