» Articles » PMID: 39730711

Foliar Application of Sodium Nitroprusside Alters the Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Capacities, and Enzymatic Activities of Strawberry Cv. Camarosa

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Dec 27
PMID 39730711
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is a horticultural crop known for its sensitivity to mechanical damage and susceptibility to postharvest decay. In recent years, various strategies have been implemented to enhance both the yield and quality of strawberries, among which the application of nitric oxide-producing compounds has garnered special attention. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of varying concentrations of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), specifically 0, 200, 400, and 600 μM, on strawberries (cv. Camarosa) cultivated in a soilless culture system. It was attempted to identify optimal treatment concentrations that would improve the quality and yield of the strawberries. The analysis of variance revealed significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) in all morphological and phytochemical properties, as well as antioxidant and enzymatic activities, between the treated samples and the control group. Notably, the highest concentrations of total phenolics, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) enzyme activity, guaiacol peroxidase enzyme activity, and potassium content in the fruit were recorded at the 400 μM SNP treatment. Specifically, these values were 6.67 mg GAE 100 g⁻ FW, 57.42 nmol g⁻ FW min⁻, 0.183 μmol HO min 100 ml extract, and 5.9% DW, respectively. Furthermore, the 200 μM SNP treatment yielded the highest ascorbic acid content (0.587 mg AA 100 g FW) and the lowest 50% inhibitory concentration for free radicals at 44.18 μl. In contrast, the 600 μM treatment resulted in the highest total flavonoid content (0.529 mg QE 100 g⁻ FW). In conclusion, the findings indicated that SNP treatment can effectively enhance the yield and improve the quality and marketability of the strawberry fruit.

References
1.
Chang Q, Zuo Z, Harrison F, Sum Chow M . Hawthorn. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 42(6):605-12. DOI: 10.1177/00970002042006003. View

2.
Sandalio L, Dalurzo H, Gomez M, Romero-Puertas M, Del Rio L . Cadmium-induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants. J Exp Bot. 2001; 52(364):2115-26. DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/52.364.2115. View

3.
Marvasi M . Potential use and perspectives of nitric oxide donors in agriculture. J Sci Food Agric. 2016; 97(4):1065-1072. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8117. View

4.
Bor J, Chen H, Yen G . Evaluation of antioxidant activity and inhibitory effect on nitric oxide production of some common vegetables. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54(5):1680-6. DOI: 10.1021/jf0527448. View

5.
Karre S, Kumar A, Dhokane D, Kushalappa A . Metabolo-transcriptome profiling of barley reveals induction of chitin elicitor receptor kinase gene (HvCERK1) conferring resistance against Fusarium graminearum. Plant Mol Biol. 2016; 93(3):247-267. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-016-0559-3. View