Quantitative Analysis of the Caloric Restriction Versus Isocaloric Diets Models Based on Macronutrients Composition: Impacts on Body Weight Regulation, Anthropometric, and Bioimpedance Parameters in Women with Obesity

Overview

Journal Front Nutr

Specialty Nutritional Sciences

Date 2024 Dec 27

PMID 39726871

Authors

Denisa Pescari

Monica Simina Mihuta

Andreea Bena

Dana Stoian

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is a growing public health issue, especially among young adults, with long-term management strategies still under debate. This prospective study compares the effects of caloric restriction and isocaloric diets with different macronutrient distributions on body composition and anthropometric parameters in obese women during a 12-week weight loss program, aiming to identify the most effective dietary strategies for managing obesity-related health outcomes.

Methods: A certified clinical nutritionist assigned specific diets over a 12-week period to 150 participants, distributed as follows: hypocaloric diets-low-energy diet (LED, 31 subjects) and very low-energy diet (VLED, 13 subjects); isocaloric diets with macronutrient distribution-low-carbohydrate diet (LCD, 48 subjects), ketogenic diet (KD, 23 subjects), and high-protein diet (HPD, 24 subjects); and isocaloric diet without macronutrient distribution-time-restricted eating (TRE, 11 subjects). Participants were dynamically monitored using anthropometric parameters: body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using the TANITA Body Composition Analyzer BC-418 MA III (T5896, Tokyo, Japan) at three key intervals-baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. The following parameters were evaluated: body weight, basal metabolic rate (BMR), percentage of total body fat, trunk fat, muscle mass, fat-free mass, and hydration status.

Results: All diets led to weight loss, but differences emerged over time. The TRE model resulted in significantly less weight loss compared to LED at the final follow-up (6.30 kg,  0.001), similar to the VLED (4.69 kg,  0.001). Isocaloric diets with varied macronutrient distributions showed significant weight loss compared to LED ( 0.001). The KD reduced waist circumference at both 6 and 12 weeks (-4.08 cm,  0.001), while significant differences in waist-to-hip ratio reduction were observed across diet groups at 12 weeks ( = 0.01). Post-hoc analysis revealed significant fat mass differences at 12 weeks, with HPD outperforming IF ( = 0.01) and VLED ( = 0.003). LCD reduced trunk fat at 6 weeks (-2.36%,  = 0.001) and 12 weeks (-3.79%,  0.001). HPD increased muscle mass at 12 weeks (2.95%,  = 0.001), while VLED decreased it (-2.02%,  = 0.031). TRE showed a smaller BMR reduction at 12 weeks compared to LED.

Conclusion: This study highlights the superior long-term benefits of isocaloric diets with macronutrients distribution over calorie-restrictive diets in optimizing weight, BMI, body composition, and central adiposity.

References

Crosby L, Davis B, Joshi S, Jardine M, Paul J, Neola M . Ketogenic Diets and Chronic Disease: Weighing the Benefits Against the Risks. Front Nutr. 2021; 8:702802. PMC: 8322232. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.702802. View

Westerterp-Plantenga M, Rolland V, Wilson S, Westerterp K . Satiety related to 24 h diet-induced thermogenesis during high protein/carbohydrate vs high fat diets measured in a respiration chamber. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999; 53(6):495-502. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600782. View

Broom G, Shaw I, Rucklidge J . The ketogenic diet as a potential treatment and prevention strategy for Alzheimer's disease. Nutrition. 2018; 60:118-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.10.003. View

Tang M, Armstrong C, Leidy H, Campbell W . Normal vs. high-protein weight loss diets in men: effects on body composition and indices of metabolic syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21(3):E204-10. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20078. View

. Rising rural body-mass index is the main driver of the global obesity epidemic in adults. Nature. 2019; 569(7755):260-264. PMC: 6784868. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1171-x. View

Mohammadifard N, Haghighatdoost F, Rahimlou M, Rodrigues A, Gaskarei M, Okhovat P . The Effect of Ketogenic Diet on Shared Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. Nutrients. 2022; 14(17). PMC: 9459811. DOI: 10.3390/nu14173499. View

Donnelly J, Sharp T, Houmard J, Carlson M, Hill J, Whatley J . Muscle hypertrophy with large-scale weight loss and resistance training. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993; 58(4):561-5. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/58.4.561. View

Papadopoulou S, Nikolaidis P . Low-Carbohydrate Diet and Human Health. Nutrients. 2023; 15(8). PMC: 10143153. DOI: 10.3390/nu15082004. View

Turner L, Harris M, Mazza D . Obesity management in general practice: does current practice match guideline recommendations?. Med J Aust. 2015; 202(7):370-2. DOI: 10.5694/mja14.00998. View

10.

Bueno N, de Melo I, de Oliveira S, Ataide T . Very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet v. low-fat diet for long-term weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2013; 110(7):1178-87. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513000548. View

11.

Commean P, Mueller M, Chen L, Wolfsberger M, Hastings M . Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Correlation and Agreement for Foot Muscle and Adipose Tissue Measurements. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022; 46(2):212-218. PMC: 9231651. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001275. View

12.

Astrup A, Grunwald G, Melanson E, Saris W, Hill J . The role of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000; 24(12):1545-52. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801453. View

13.

Kuriyan R . Body composition techniques. Indian J Med Res. 2019; 148(5):648-658. PMC: 6366261. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1777_18. View

14.

Paoli A, Rubini A, Volek J, Grimaldi K . Beyond weight loss: a review of the therapeutic uses of very-low-carbohydrate (ketogenic) diets. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013; 67(8):789-96. PMC: 3826507. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.116. View

15.

Lemon P, Proctor D . Protein intake and athletic performance. Sports Med. 1991; 12(5):313-25. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199112050-00004. View

16.

Seo M, Lee W, Kim S, Kang J, Kang J, Kim K . 2018 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline for the Management of Obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2019; 28(1):40-45. PMC: 6484940. DOI: 10.7570/jomes.2019.28.1.40. View

17.

Kusminski C, Perez-Tilve D, Muller T, DiMarchi R, Tschop M, Scherer P . Transforming obesity: The advancement of multi-receptor drugs. Cell. 2024; 187(15):3829-3853. PMC: 11286204. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.003. View

18.

Donnelly J, Jakicic J, Gunderson S . Diet and body composition. Effect of very low calorie diets and exercise. Sports Med. 1991; 12(4):237-49. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199112040-00003. View

19.

Wilson J, Wilson G . Contemporary issues in protein requirements and consumption for resistance trained athletes. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2008; 3:7-27. PMC: 2129150. DOI: 10.1186/1550-2783-3-1-7. View

20.

English S, Vallis M . Moving beyond eat less, move more using willpower: Reframing obesity as a chronic disease impact of the 2020 Canadian obesity guidelines reframed narrative on perceptions of self and the patient-provider relationship. Clin Obes. 2023; 13(6):e12615. DOI: 10.1111/cob.12615. View