» Articles » PMID: 39712948

Prognostic Impact of CCA Components in Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma

Overview
Date 2024 Dec 23
PMID 39712948
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the differences of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients with a cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) component ≥ 30% or < 30% versus intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) prognoses.

Methods: Patients with cHCC-CCA and iCCA after surgery were recruited. All cHCC-CCA patients were divided into two subgroups (CCA components ≥ 30% and < 30%). Then, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to investigate and compare the differences of cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% or < 30% versus iCCAs in RFS and OS prognoses, respectively. The differences of MRI features between cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% and < 30% were also compared.

Results: One hundred sixty-four cHCC-CCAs and 146 iCCAs were enrolled. Compared with iCCAs, cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component < 30% had better OS prognosis (HR: 2.888, p = 0.045). However, Cox regression analysis revealed that cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% had poorer RFS (HR: 0.503, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.58, p = 0.033) prognoses than iCCAs. In addition, rim APHE (OR = 0.286, p < 0.001), targetoid diffusion restriction (OR = 0.316, p = 0.019), corona enhancement (OR = 0.481, p = 0.033), delayed enhancement (OR = 0.251, p = 0.001), and LR-M (OR = 1.586, p < 0.001) were significant factors associated with cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30%. Multivariable regression analyses showed that only LR-M (OR = 1.522, p = 0.042) was a significantly independent predictor for cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30%.

Conclusion: cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% had worse prognoses than iCCAs. Therefore, we suggest that the postoperative treatment of cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% can be based on the treatment strategy for iCCAs.

References
1.
Choi S, Jeon S, Lee S, Lee J, Hur B, Kang H . Radio-pathologic correlation of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma): changes in the 2019 WHO classification and impact on LI-RADS classification at liver MRI. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(12):9479-9488. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07984-w. View

2.
Jeon S, Joo I, Lee D, Lee S, Kang H, Lee K . Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(1):373-382. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5605-x. View

3.
Yoon Y, Hwang S, Lee Y, Kim K, Ahn C, Moon D . Postresection Outcomes of Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015; 20(2):411-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-3045-3. View

4.
Jung D, Hwang S, Song G, Ahn C, Moon D, Kim K . Longterm prognosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma following liver transplantation and resection. Liver Transpl. 2016; 23(3):330-341. DOI: 10.1002/lt.24711. View

5.
Jiang X, Huang X, Huang C, Chen L, Liang L, Yin X . Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2020; 8(2):134-142. PMC: 7136721. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goaa003. View