» Articles » PMID: 39693591

Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III PostMONARCH Trial

Abstract

Purpose: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

Results: This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without or mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% 7%; nominal = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.

Conclusion: Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.

Citing Articles

Efficiency of Fulvestrant Monotherapy After CDK4/6 Inhibitor Exposure: Is This a Viable Choice?.

Ogata N, Barnett B, Sharp N, Fujii T, Iwase T, Dunn S Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075731 PMC: 11898757. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050884.


Optimizing therapeutic approaches for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: clinical perspectives on biomarkers and treatment strategies post-CDK4/6 inhibitor progression.

Cejalvo Andujar J, Ayala de la Pena F, Margeli Vila M, Pascual J, Tolosa P, Pages C Cancer Drug Resist. 2025; 8:5.

PMID: 39935426 PMC: 11810462. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2024.169.


Targeting CDK4/6 in breast cancer.

Shanabag A, Armand J, Son E, Yang H Exp Mol Med. 2025; 57(2):312-322.

PMID: 39930131 PMC: 11873051. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-025-01395-3.


Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis on Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer After CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

Pathak N, Mittal A, Kumar S, Nagpal C, Amir E, Haldar P Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(1).

PMID: 39851969 PMC: 11763720. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32010053.


Advancing treatment choices: CDK4/6 inhibitor switching in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Zagami P, Esposito A, Taurelli Salimbeni B, Berton Giachetti P, Scafetta R, Lambertini M Breast. 2025; 79:103875.

PMID: 39826385 PMC: 11786079. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.103875.