» Articles » PMID: 39690142

Unexpected Sounds Induce a Rapid Inhibition of Eye-movement Responses

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2024 Dec 17
PMID 39690142
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unexpected sounds have been shown to trigger a global and transient inhibition of motor responses. Recent evidence suggests that eye movements may also be inhibited in a similar way, but it is not clear how quickly unexpected sounds can affect eye-movement responses. Additionally, little is known about whether they affect only voluntary saccades or also reflexive saccades. In this study, participants performed a pro-saccade and an anti-saccade task while the timing of sounds relative to stimulus onset was manipulated. Pro-saccades are generally reflexive and stimulus-driven, whereas anti-saccades require the generation of a voluntary saccade in the opposite direction of a peripheral stimulus. Unexpected novel sounds inhibited the execution of both pro- and anti-saccades compared to standard sounds, but the inhibition was stronger for anti-saccades. Novel sounds affected response latencies as early as 150 ms before the peripheral cue to make a saccade, all the way to 25 ms after the cue to make a saccade. Interestingly, unexpected sounds also reduced anti-saccade task errors, indicating that they aided inhibitory control. Overall, these results suggest that unexpected sounds yield a global and rapid inhibition of eye-movement responses. This inhibition also helps suppress reflexive eye-movement responses in favor of more voluntarily generated ones.

Citing Articles

Unexpected sounds induce a rapid inhibition of eye-movement responses.

Vasilev M, Ozkan Z, Kirkby J, Nuthmann A, Parmentier F Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14728.

PMID: 39690142 PMC: 11652409. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14728.

References
1.
Andres P, Parmentier F, Escera C . The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(12):2564-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.005. View

2.
Widmann A, Engbert R, Schroger E . Microsaccadic responses indicate fast categorization of sounds: a novel approach to study auditory cognition. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(33):11152-8. PMC: 6705255. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1568-14.2014. View

3.
Evens D, Ludwig C . Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance. Exp Brain Res. 2010; 205(4):545-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2393-1. View

4.
Schroger E, Wolff C . Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. Neuroreport. 1998; 9(15):3355-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199810260-00003. View

5.
Bompas A, Sumner P . Temporal dynamics of saccadic distraction. J Vis. 2009; 9(9):17.1-14. DOI: 10.1167/9.9.17. View