» Articles » PMID: 39665137

AI-Powered Multimodal Modeling of Personalized Hemodynamics in Aortic Stenosis

Overview
Journal Adv Sci (Weinh)
Date 2024 Dec 12
PMID 39665137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in developed countries. High-fidelity preclinical models can improve AS management by enabling therapeutic innovation, early diagnosis, and tailored treatment planning. However, their use is currently limited by complex workflows necessitating lengthy expert-driven manual operations. Here, we propose an AI-powered computational framework for accelerated and democratized patient-specific modeling of AS hemodynamics from computed tomography (CT). First, we demonstrate that the automated meshing algorithms can generate task-ready geometries for both computational and benchtop simulations with higher accuracy and 100 times faster than existing approaches. Then, we show that the approach can be integrated with fluid-structure interaction and soft robotics models to accurately recapitulate a broad spectrum of clinical hemodynamic measurements of diverse AS patients. The efficiency and reliability of these algorithms make them an ideal complementary tool for personalized high-fidelity modeling of AS biomechanics, hemodynamics, and treatment planning.

Citing Articles

AI-Powered Multimodal Modeling of Personalized Hemodynamics in Aortic Stenosis.

Ozturk C, Pak D, Rosalia L, Goswami D, Robakowski M, McKay R Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(5):e2404755.

PMID: 39665137 PMC: 11791996. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202404755.

References
1.
Haghiashtiani G, Qiu K, Zhingre Sanchez J, Fuenning Z, Nair P, Ahlberg S . 3D printed patient-specific aortic root models with internal sensors for minimally invasive applications. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(35):eabb4641. PMC: 7455187. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abb4641. View

2.
Gurev V, Pathmanathan P, Fattebert J, Wen H, Magerlein J, Gray R . A high-resolution computational model of the deforming human heart. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015; 14(4):829-49. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-014-0639-8. View

3.
Kovarovic B, Rotman O, Parikh P, Slepian M, Bluestein D . Patient-specific in vitro testing for evaluating TAVR clinical performance-A complementary approach to current ISO standard testing. Artif Organs. 2020; 45(4):E41-E52. PMC: 8068093. DOI: 10.1111/aor.13841. View

4.
Pak D, Liu M, Kim T, Liang L, Caballero A, Onofrey J . Patient-Specific Heart Geometry Modeling for Solid Biomechanics Using Deep Learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2023; 43(1):203-215. PMC: 10764002. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2023.3294128. View

5.
Bosi G, Capelli C, Cheang M, Delahunty N, Mullen M, Taylor A . A validated computational framework to predict outcomes in TAVI. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):9906. PMC: 7303192. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66899-6. View