» Articles » PMID: 39635458

Public Acceptability of Proposals to Manage New Takeaway Food Outlets Near Schools: Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2021 International Food Policy Study

Abstract

Global trends indicate that takeaway food is commonly accessible in neighbourhood food environments. Local governments in England can use spatial planning to manage the opening of new takeaway outlets in 'takeaway management zones around schools' (known sometimes as 'exclusion zones'). We analysed data from the 2021 International Food Policy Study to investigate public acceptability of takeaway management zones around schools. Among adults living in Great Britain ( = 3323), 50.8% supported, 8.9% opposed, and 37.3% were neutral about the adoption of these zones. Almost three-quarters (70.4%) believed that these zones would help young people to eat better. Among 16-17 year olds ( = 354), 33.3% agreed that young people would consume takeaway food less often if there were fewer takeaways near schools. Using adjusted logistic regression, we identified multiple correlates of public support for and perceived effectiveness of takeaway management zones. Odds of support were strongest among adults reporting that there were currently too many takeaways in their neighbourhood food environment (odds ratio: 2.32; 95% confidence intervals: 1.61, 3.35). High levels of support alongside limited opposition indicate that proposals for takeaway management zones around schools would not receive substantial public disapproval. Policy makers should not, therefore, use limited public support to rationalise policy inertia.

Citing Articles

Planning guidance to limit hot food takeaways: Understanding the possible economic impacts.

Derbyshire D, Medina-Lara A, Amies-Cull B, Chang M, Cummins S, Hassan S Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e38798.

PMID: 39640830 PMC: 11620150. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38798.

References
1.
Huang Y, Burgoine T, Essman M, Theis D, Bishop T, Adams J . Monitoring the Nutrient Composition of Food Prepared Out-of-Home in the United Kingdom: Database Development and Case Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022; 8(9):e39033. PMC: 9501650. DOI: 10.2196/39033. View

2.
Keeble M, Adams J, Burgoine T . Investigating experiences of frequent online food delivery service use: a qualitative study in UK adults. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1365. PMC: 9287535. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13721-9. View

3.
Nixon L, Mejia P, Dorfman L, Cheyne A, Young S, Friedman L . Fast-food fights: news coverage of local efforts to improve food environments through land-use regulations, 2001-2013. [corrected]. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(3):490-6. PMC: 4330826. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302368. View

4.
Hoenink J, Huang Y, Keeble M, Mackenbach J, Pinho M, Burgoine T . Socioeconomic distribution of food outlet availability through online food delivery services in seven European countries: A cross-sectional study. Health Place. 2023; 84:103135. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103135. View

5.
Howse E, Cullerton K, Grunseit A, Bohn-Goldbaum E, Bauman A, Freeman B . Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022; 20(1):26. PMC: 8895540. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y. View