» Articles » PMID: 39631777

Youth Involvement in Policy Processes in Public Health, Education, and Social Work-A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal Obes Rev
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Dec 4
PMID 39631777
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Youth involvement in policy formulation may enhance its relevance, strengthen democratic practices, and contribute to youth development. This scoping review explored the nature, extent, and impact of adolescent involvement in policy processes aimed at improving adolescent health and well-being in the public health, education, and social work sectors.

Methods: Studies of adolescent involvement in policy processes focusing on health, and well-being, including obesity prevention were eligible. We searched seven databases, reference lists of included studies, and contacted key organizations. Standard scoping review methods were applied. The results were synthesized narratively, using descriptive statistics and visuals.

Results: We included 33 mostly qualitative studies, mainly from the public health sector in the USA and Europe, focusing on diet, physical activity, health & well-being, or sexual and reproductive health. Adolescents were consulted or collaborated with, mostly in identifying problems or policy solutions and less often in agenda-setting, decision-making, and evaluation. Various facilitators were used to improve participation (e.g. training, adult facilitators, monetary compensation). Data on adolescents' experiences of involvement and the impact on policies were limited.

Conclusion: Due to a paucity of impact studies, we could not determine whether adolescent involvement increased the relevance of policies or improved adolescent development. The extent to which adolescents were meaningfully involved, and had a material effect on decision-making, was largely unclear. Improved documentation, monitoring, and evaluation of youth involvement in policy using quantitative methods and standardized frameworks, can improve the evidence-based, involvement practices, and decrease inequities.

Citing Articles

Youth involvement in policy processes in public health, education, and social work-A scoping review.

Flodgren G, Helleve A, Selsto A, Fismen A, Blanchard L, Rutter H Obes Rev. 2024; 26(4):e13874.

PMID: 39631777 PMC: 11884962. DOI: 10.1111/obr.13874.

References
1.
Taylor A, McMellon C, French T, MacLachlan A, Evans R, Lewis R . Defining research priorities for youth public mental health: reflections on a coproduction approach to transdisciplinary working. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022; 20(1):72. PMC: 9207849. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00871-w. View

2.
Callaghan M, Muller-Hansen F . Statistical stopping criteria for automated screening in systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2020; 9(1):273. PMC: 7700715. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01521-4. View

3.
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):143. PMC: 6245623. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. View

4.
Prapaveissis D, Henry A, Okiama E, Funaki T, Faeamani G, Masaga J . Assessing youth empowerment and co-design to advance Pasifika health: a qualitative research study in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021; 46(1):56-61. PMC: 9936602. DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13187. View

5.
Duea S, Zimmerman E, Vaughn L, Dias S, Harris J . A Guide to Selecting Participatory Research Methods Based on Project and Partnership Goals. J Particip Res Methods. 2022; 3(1). PMC: 9258244. DOI: 10.35844/001c.32605. View