Optimisation of Gene Expression Noise for Cellular Persistence Against Lethal Events

Overview

Journal J Theor Biol

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Nov 27

PMID 39603338

Authors

Pavol Bokes

Abhyudai Singh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Bacterial cell persistence, crucial for survival under adverse conditions like antibiotic exposure, is intrinsically linked to stochastic fluctuations in gene expression. Certain genes, while inhibiting growth under normal circumstances, confer tolerance to antibiotics at elevated expression levels. The occurrence of antibiotic events lead to instantaneous cellular responses with varied survival probabilities correlated with gene expression levels. Notably, cells with lower protein concentrations face higher mortality rates. This study aims to elucidate an optimal strategy for protein expression conducive to cellular survival. Through comprehensive mathematical analysis, we determine the optimal burst size and frequency that maximise cell proliferation. Furthermore, we explore how the optimal expression distribution changes as the cost of protein expression to growth escalates. Our model reveals a hysteresis phenomenon, characterised by discontinuous transitions between deterministic and stochastic optima. Intriguingly, stochastic optima possess a noise floor, representing the minimal level of fluctuations essential for optimal cellular resilience.

References

Lunz D, Bonnans J, Ruess J . Optimal control of bioproduction in the presence of population heterogeneity. J Math Biol. 2023; 86(3):43. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-023-01876-x. View

Schwall C, Loman T, Martins B, Cortijo S, Villava C, Kusmartsev V . Tunable phenotypic variability through an autoregulatory alternative sigma factor circuit. Mol Syst Biol. 2021; 17(7):e9832. PMC: 8287880. DOI: 10.15252/msb.20209832. View

Gunnarsson E, De S, Leder K, Foo J . Understanding the role of phenotypic switching in cancer drug resistance. J Theor Biol. 2020; 490:110162. PMC: 7785289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110162. View

Yu J, Xiao J, Ren X, Lao K, Xie X . Probing gene expression in live cells, one protein molecule at a time. Science. 2006; 311(5767):1600-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1119623. View

Feng J, Kessler D, Ben-Jacob E, Levine H . Growth feedback as a basis for persister bistability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 111(1):544-9. PMC: 3890803. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320396110. View

Sturrock M, Li S, Shahrezaei V . The influence of nuclear compartmentalisation on stochastic dynamics of self-repressing gene expression. J Theor Biol. 2017; 424:55-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.05.003. View

Martins B, Locke J . Microbial individuality: how single-cell heterogeneity enables population level strategies. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015; 24:104-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.01.003. View

Scott M, Gunderson C, Mateescu E, Zhang Z, Hwa T . Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science. 2010; 330(6007):1099-102. DOI: 10.1126/science.1192588. View

Krah L, Hermsen R . The effect of natural selection on the propagation of protein expression noise to bacterial growth. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(7):e1009208. PMC: 8321134. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009208. View

10.

Iida K, Obata N, Kimura Y . Quantifying heterogeneity of stochastic gene expression. J Theor Biol. 2019; 465:56-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.01.003. View

11.

Puccioni F, Pausch J, Piho P, Thomas P . Survival Resonances during Fractional Killing of Cell Populations. Phys Rev Lett. 2024; 133(19):198401. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.198401. View

12.

Kleijn I, Krah L, Hermsen R . Noise propagation in an integrated model of bacterial gene expression and growth. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(10):e1006386. PMC: 6192656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006386. View

13.

Niepel M, Spencer S, Sorger P . Non-genetic cell-to-cell variability and the consequences for pharmacology. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2009; 13(5-6):556-61. PMC: 2975492. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.015. View

14.

Kessler D, Levine H . Phenomenological Approach to Cancer Cell Persistence. Phys Rev Lett. 2022; 129(10):108101. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.108101. View

15.

Balaban N, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S . Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science. 2004; 305(5690):1622-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1099390. View

16.

Tkacik G, Callan Jr C, Bialek W . Information flow and optimization in transcriptional regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(34):12265-70. PMC: 2527900. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806077105. View

17.

Hausser J, Mayo A, Keren L, Alon U . Central dogma rates and the trade-off between precision and economy in gene expression. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):68. PMC: 6325141. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07391-8. View

18.

Padovan-Merhar O, Nair G, Biaesch A, Mayer A, Scarfone S, Foley S . Single mammalian cells compensate for differences in cellular volume and DNA copy number through independent global transcriptional mechanisms. Mol Cell. 2015; 58(2):339-52. PMC: 4402149. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.005. View

19.

Rotem E, Loinger A, Ronin I, Levin-Reisman I, Gabay C, Shoresh N . Regulation of phenotypic variability by a threshold-based mechanism underlies bacterial persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(28):12541-6. PMC: 2906590. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004333107. View

20.

Harmange G, Reyes Hueros R, Schaff D, Emert B, Saint-Antoine M, Kim L . Disrupting cellular memory to overcome drug resistance. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7130. PMC: 10628298. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41811-8. View