» Articles » PMID: 39594149

Radiomics Feature Stability in True and Virtual Non-Contrast Reconstructions from Cardiac Photon-Counting Detector CT Datasets

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39594149
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Virtual non-contrast (VNC) series reconstructed from contrast-enhanced cardiac scans acquired with photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) systems have the potential to replace true non-contrast (TNC) series. However, a quantitative comparison of the image characteristics of TNC and VNC data is necessary to determine to what extent they are interchangeable. This work quantitatively evaluates the image similarity between VNC and TNC reconstructions by measuring the stability of multi-class radiomics features extracted in intra-patient TNC and VNC reconstructions. : TNC and VNC series of 84 patients were retrospectively collected. For each patient, the myocardium and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) were semi-automatically segmented in both VNC and TNC reconstructions, and 105 radiomics features were extracted in each mask. Intra-feature correlation scores were computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Stable features were defined with an ICC higher than 0.75. : In the myocardium, 41 stable features were identified, and the three with the highest ICC were glrlm_GrayLevelVariance with ICC3 of 0.98 [0.97, 0.99], ngtdm_Strength with ICC3 of 0.97 [0.95, 0.98], firstorder_Variance with ICC3 of 0.96 [0.94, 0.98]. For the epicardial fat, 40 stable features were found, and the three highest ranked are firstorder_Median with ICC3 of 0.96 [0.93, 0.97], firstorder_RootMeanSquared with ICC3 of 0.95 [0.92, 0.97], firstorder_Mean with ICC3 of 0.95 [0.92, 0.97]. A total of 24 features (22.8%; 24/105) showed stability in both anatomical structures. : The significant differences in the correlation of radiomics features in VNC and TNC volumes of the myocardium and epicardial fat suggested that the two reconstructions may differ more than initially assumed. This indicates that they may not be interchangeable, and such differences could have clinical implications. Therefore, care should be given when selecting VNC as a substitute for TNC in radiomics research to ensure accurate and reliable analysis. Moreover, the observed variations may impact clinical workflows, where precise tissue characterization is critical for diagnosis and treatment planning.

References
1.
Emrich T, Aquino G, Schoepf U, Braun F, Risch F, Bette S . Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Calcium Scoring: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm on a Clinical, First-Generation Dual-Source Photon Counting-Detector System. Invest Radiol. 2022; 57(8):536-543. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000868. View

2.
Wasserthal J, Breit H, Meyer M, Pradella M, Hinck D, Sauter A . TotalSegmentator: Robust Segmentation of 104 Anatomic Structures in CT Images. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023; 5(5):e230024. PMC: 10546353. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230024. View

3.
Vecsey-Nagy M, Varga-Szemes A, Emrich T, Zsarnoczay E, Nagy N, Fink N . Calcium scoring on coronary computed angiography tomography with photon-counting detector technology: Predictors of performance. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023; 17(5):328-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.08.004. View

4.
Moss A, Williams M, Newby D, Nicol E . The Updated NICE Guidelines: Cardiac CT as the First-Line Test for Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2017; 10(5):15. PMC: 5368205. DOI: 10.1007/s12410-017-9412-6. View

5.
Lubner M, Smith A, Sandrasegaran K, Sahani D, Pickhardt P . CT Texture Analysis: Definitions, Applications, Biologic Correlates, and Challenges. Radiographics. 2017; 37(5):1483-1503. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017170056. View