» Articles » PMID: 39592816

Analgesic Effects of High-frequency RTMS on Pain Anticipation and Perception

Overview
Journal Commun Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Nov 26
PMID 39592816
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies suggest that pain perception is greatly shaped by anticipation, with M1 and DLPFC involved in this process. We hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS targeting these regions could alter pain anticipation and thereby reduce pain perception. In a double-blind, sham-controlled study, healthy participants received 10 Hz rTMS to M1, DLPFC, or a sham treatment. Assessments were conducted before, immediately after, and 60 min after stimulation, including laser-evoked potentials, pain ratings, and anticipatory EEG. M1-rTMS immediately reduced laser-evoked P2 amplitude, increased sensorimotor high-frequency α-oscillation power, and accelerated peak alpha frequency in the midfrontal region during pain anticipation. In contrast, DLPFC-rTMS reduced the N2-P2 complex and pain ratings 60 min post-stimulation, an effect associated with prolonged microstate C duration during pain anticipation-a microstate linked to default mode network activity. Thus, M1-rTMS immediately modulates anticipatory α-oscillations and laser-evoked potentials, while DLPFC-rTMS induces delayed analgesic effects partially by modulating default mode network activity.

Citing Articles

Multimodal abnormalities of brain function in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Chen X, Chen N, Lai P, Sun Y, Yu J, Xin M Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1535288.

PMID: 39975971 PMC: 11836031. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1535288.


Analgesic effects of high-frequency rTMS on pain anticipation and perception.

Li X, Liu Z, Hu Y, Jin R, Lou W, Peng W Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1573.

PMID: 39592816 PMC: 11599282. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07129-x.

References
1.
Conforto A, ZGraggen W, Kohl A, Rosler K, Kaelin-Lang A . Impact of coil position and electrophysiological monitoring on determination of motor thresholds to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(4):812-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.010. View

2.
Sarnthein J, Stern J, Aufenberg C, Rousson V, Jeanmonod D . Increased EEG power and slowed dominant frequency in patients with neurogenic pain. Brain. 2005; 129(Pt 1):55-64. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh631. View

3.
Strafella A, Paus T, Barrett J, Dagher A . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human prefrontal cortex induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(15):RC157. PMC: 6762641. View

4.
Seitzman B, Abell M, Bartley S, Erickson M, Bolbecker A, Hetrick W . Cognitive manipulation of brain electric microstates. Neuroimage. 2016; 146:533-543. PMC: 5321823. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.002. View

5.
Laufs H, Kleinschmidt A, Beyerle A, Eger E, Salek-Haddadi A, Preibisch C . EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha activity. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(4):1463-76. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00286-6. View