6.
Lee J, Lee S
. The Roles of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Liver Metastasis and Therapeutic Approaches. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017; 2017:7521987.
PMC: 5447280.
DOI: 10.1155/2017/7521987.
View
7.
Charakorn C, Thadanipon K, Chaijindaratana S, Rattanasiri S, Numthavaj P, Thakkinstian A
. The association between serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and recurrence and survival of patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 150(1):190-200.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.056.
View
8.
Tian Z, Zhu L, Xie Y, Hu H, Ren Q, Liu J
. The mechanism of high mobility group box-1 protein and its bidirectional regulation in tumors. Biomol Biomed. 2023; 24(3):477-485.
PMC: 11088895.
DOI: 10.17305/bb.2023.9760.
View
9.
Kostova N, Zlateva S, Ugrinova I, Pasheva E
. The expression of HMGB1 protein and its receptor RAGE in human malignant tumors. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009; 337(1-2):251-8.
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-009-0305-0.
View
10.
George Onyango C, Ogonda L, Guyah B, Shiluli C, Ganda G, Orango O
. Novel biomarkers with promising benefits for diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: a systematic review. Infect Agent Cancer. 2020; 15(1):68.
PMC: 7670699.
DOI: 10.1186/s13027-020-00335-2.
View
11.
Zhu H
. Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen: Clinical Application and Research Status. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(5).
PMC: 9139199.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051065.
View
12.
Iida M, Banno K, Yanokura M, Nakamura K, Adachi M, Nogami Y
. Candidate biomarkers for cervical cancer treatment: Potential for clinical practice (Review). Mol Clin Oncol. 2014; 2(5):647-655.
PMC: 4106747.
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.324.
View
13.
Han C, Zhao F, Wan C, He Y, Chen Y
. Associations between the expression of SCCA, MTA1, P16, Ki-67 and the infection of high-risk HPV in cervical lesions. Oncol Lett. 2020; 20(1):884-892.
PMC: 7286137.
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11634.
View
14.
Nessa A, Hossain M, Uddin S, Islam M, Khan M, Azad A
. Electronic aggregated data collection on cervical cancer screening in Bangladesh since 2014: what the data tells us?. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):270.
PMC: 10804837.
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17545-z.
View
15.
Yang D, Wang J, Zhang L
. Serum SCCA levels in patients suffering cancers or other diseases. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2019; 162:165-175.
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2018.12.004.
View
16.
Kim H, Song Y
. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system revised: what should be considered critically for gynecologic cancer?. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 20(3):135-6.
PMC: 2757555.
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2009.20.3.135.
View
17.
Perkins R, Wentzensen N, Guido R, Schiffman M
. Cervical Cancer Screening: A Review. JAMA. 2023; 330(6):547-558.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.13174.
View
18.
Li P, Xu M, Cai H, Thapa N, He C, Song Z
. The effect of HMGB1 on the clinicopathological and prognostic features of cervical cancer. Biosci Rep. 2019; 39(5).
PMC: 6499451.
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20181016.
View
19.
Sheng X, Du X, Zhang X, Li D, Lu C, Li Q
. Clinical value of serum HMGB1 levels in early detection of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix: comparison with serum SCCA, CYFRA21-1, and CEA levels. Croat Med J. 2009; 50(5):455-64.
PMC: 2765737.
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.455.
View
20.
Ruiz Esparza Garrido R, Gutierrez M, Velazquez Flores M
. Circulating cervical cancer biomarkers potentially useful in medical attention (Review). Mol Clin Oncol. 2023; 18(2):13.
PMC: 9892968.
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2023.2609.
View