» Articles » PMID: 39582895

A Review on Federated Learning in Computational Pathology

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Nov 25
PMID 39582895
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Training generalizable computational pathology (CPATH) algorithms is heavily dependent on large-scale, multi-institutional data. Simultaneously, healthcare data underlies strict data privacy rules, hindering the creation of large datasets. Federated Learning (FL) is a paradigm addressing this dilemma, by allowing separate institutions to collaborate in a training process while keeping each institution's data private and exchanging model parameters instead. In this study, we identify and review key developments of FL for CPATH applications. We consider 15 studies, thereby evaluating the current status of exploring and adapting this emerging technology for CPATH applications. Proof-of-concept studies have been conducted across a wide range of CPATH use cases, showcasing the performance equivalency of models trained in a federated compared to a centralized manner. Six studies focus on model aggregation or model alignment methods reporting minor ( ) performance improvement compared to conventional FL techniques, while four studies explore domain alignment methods, resulting in more significant performance improvements ( ). To further reduce the privacy risk posed by sharing model parameters, four studies investigated the use of privacy preservation methods, where all methods demonstrated equivalent or slightly degraded performance ( lower). To facilitate broader, real-world environment adoption, it is imperative to establish guidelines for the setup and deployment of FL infrastructure, alongside the promotion of standardized software frameworks. These steps are crucial to 1) further democratize CPATH research by allowing smaller institutions to pool data and computational resources 2) investigating rare diseases, 3) conducting multi-institutional studies, and 4) allowing rapid prototyping on private data.

References
1.
Vorontsov E, Bozkurt A, Casson A, Shaikovski G, Zelechowski M, Severson K . A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection. Nat Med. 2024; 30(10):2924-2935. PMC: 11485232. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03141-0. View

2.
Couture H . Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Molecular Tumor Biomarkers from H&E: A Practical Review. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(12). PMC: 9784641. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12122022. View

3.
Niazi M, Parwani A, Gurcan M . Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(5):e253-e261. PMC: 8711251. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30154-8. View

4.
Du Terrail J, Leopold A, Joly C, Beguier C, Andreux M, Maussion C . Federated learning for predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Med. 2023; 29(1):135-146. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02155-w. View

5.
Kong F, Wang X, Xiang J, Yang S, Wang X, Yue M . Federated attention consistent learning models for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:1439-1449. PMC: 11016961. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.03.028. View