» Articles » PMID: 39557569

Pupil Trend Reflects Suboptimal Alertness Maintenance over 10 s in Vigilance and Working Memory Performance: An Exploratory Study

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Nov 18
PMID 39557569
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Maintaining concentration on demanding cognitive tasks, such as vigilance (VG) and working memory (WM) tasks, is crucial for successful task completion. Previous research suggests that internal concentration maintenance fluctuates, potentially declining to suboptimal states, which can influence trial-by-trial performance in these tasks. However, the timescale of such alertness maintenance, as indicated by slow changes in pupil diameter, has not been thoroughly investigated. This study explored whether "pupil trends"-which selectively signal suboptimal tonic alertness maintenance at various timescales-negatively correlate with trial-by-trial performance in VG and WM tasks. Using the psychomotor vigilance task (VG) and the visual-spatial two-back task (WM), we found that human pupil trends lasting over 10 s were significantly higher in trials with longer reaction times, indicating poorer performance, compared with shorter reaction time trials, which indicated better performance. The attention network test further validated that these slow trends reflect suboptimal states related to (tonic) alertness maintenance rather than suboptimal performance specific to VG and WM tasks, which is more associated with (phasic) responses to instantaneous interference. These findings highlight the potential role of detecting and compensating for nonoptimal states in VG and WM performance, significantly beyond the 10 s timescale. Additionally, the findings suggest the possibility of estimating human concentration during various visual tasks, even when rapid pupil changes occur due to luminance fluctuations.

Citing Articles

Pupil Trend Reflects Suboptimal Alertness Maintenance over 10 s in Vigilance and Working Memory Performance: An Exploratory Study.

Yamashita J, Terashima H, Yoneya M, Maruya K, Oishi H, Kumada T eNeuro. 2024; 11(12).

PMID: 39557569 PMC: 11656038. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0250-24.2024.

References
1.
Peirce J . Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform. 2009; 2:10. PMC: 2636899. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008. View

2.
Robison M, Unsworth N . Pupillometry tracks fluctuations in working memory performance. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018; 81(2):407-419. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1618-4. View

3.
Fan J, McCandliss B, Fossella J, Flombaum J, Posner M . The activation of attentional networks. Neuroimage. 2005; 26(2):471-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004. View

4.
Sridharan D, Levitin D, Menon V . A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(34):12569-74. PMC: 2527952. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800005105. View

5.
Adam K, Mance I, Fukuda K, Vogel E . The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015; 27(8):1601-16. PMC: 4494675. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00811. View