Chest Drainage Outcomes by Water Seal Versus Low Suction on Digital Drainage Systems After Lung Resection: Retrospective Study

Overview

Journal J Thorac Dis

Publisher AME Publishing Company

Specialty Pulmonary Medicine

Date 2024 Nov 18

PMID 39552854

Authors

Takahiro Honda

Shunsuke Tauchi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in chest drainage technology, such as the use of digital drainage systems (DDS), there is still no consensus on the most effective method for reducing air leaks after lung resection. To evaluate the optimal drainage method, we compared traditional water seal with low suction pressure settings on DDS.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative data of patients between August 2015 and April 2023 who underwent anatomical lung resection at our hospital and who had postoperative chest drains managed with either a water seal or DDS set to low suction pressure. We excluded cases without air leak on the first postoperative morning from the consideration in this study. We divided the patients into two groups according to the chest drainage method on the first postoperative morning and we compared air leak and chest drainage durations of both groups.

Results: We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients. The groups (water seal: 59 patients; low suction: 57 patients) were well balanced for baseline and degree of air leakage on the first operative morning. The water seal group showed significantly shorter air leak duration (2 3 days, P<0.001) and chest drainage duration (3 5 days, P<0.001) compared with the low suction group. Pleurodesis (P=0.002) and conversion (P=0.001) were higher in the low suction group, with no significant differences in drain reinsertion.

Conclusions: Water seal management was suggested to be safe and comparably effective to low suction on DDS in reducing air leak and chest drainage durations after lung resection.

References

Zhou J, Chen N, Hai Y, Lyu M, Wang Z, Gao Y . External suction versus simple water-seal on chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: an updated meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018; 28(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy216. View

Brunelli A, Salati M, Pompili C, Refai M, Sabbatini A . Regulated tailored suction vs regulated seal: a prospective randomized trial on air leak duration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 43(5):899-904. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs518. View

Cerfolio R, Tummala R, Holman W, Zorn G, Kirklin J, McGiffin D . A prospective algorithm for the management of air leaks after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 66(5):1726-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00958-8. View

Shintani Y, Funaki S, Ose N, Kawamura T, Kanzaki R, Minami M . Air leak pattern shown by digital chest drainage system predict prolonged air leakage after pulmonary resection for patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(6):3714-3721. PMC: 6051872. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.150. View

Deng B, Tan Q, Zhao Y, Wang R, Jiang Y . Suction or non-suction to the underwater seal drains following pulmonary operation: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 38(2):210-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.050. View

Marshall M, Deeb M, Bleier J, Kucharczuk J, Friedberg J, Kaiser L . Suction vs water seal after pulmonary resection: a randomized prospective study. Chest. 2002; 121(3):831-5. DOI: 10.1378/chest.121.3.831. View

Alphonso N, Tan C, Utley M, Cameron R, Dussek J, Lang-Lazdunski L . A prospective randomized controlled trial of suction versus non-suction to the under-water seal drains following lung resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005; 27(3):391-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.004. View

Adachi H, Wakimoto S, Ando K, Yamamoto T, Saito Y, Shiono S . Optimal Chest Drainage Method After Anatomic Lung Resection: A Prospective Observational Study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022; 115(4):845-852. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.06.042. View

Kanda Y . Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012; 48(3):452-8. PMC: 3590441. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. View

10.

Leo F, Duranti L, Girelli L, Furia S, Bille A, Garofalo G . Does external pleural suction reduce prolonged air leak after lung resection? Results from the AirINTrial after 500 randomized cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96(4):1234-1239. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.079. View

11.

Holbek B, Christensen M, Hansen H, Kehlet H, Petersen R . The effects of low suction on digital drainage devices after lobectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 55(4):673-681. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy361. View

12.

Mitsui S, Tauchi S, Uchida T, Ohnishi H, Shimokawa T, Tobe S . Low suction on digital drainage devices promptly improves post-operative air leaks following lung resection operations: a retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021; 16(1):105. PMC: 8059315. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01485-z. View

13.

Cerfolio R, Bass C, Katholi C . Prospective randomized trial compares suction versus water seal for air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71(5):1613-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02474-2. View

14.

Pompili C, Detterbeck F, Papagiannopoulos K, Sihoe A, Vachlas K, Maxfield M . Multicenter international randomized comparison of objective and subjective outcomes between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98(2):490-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.043. View

15.

Bharat A, Graf N, Mullen A, Kanter J, Andrei A, Sporn P . Pleural Hypercarbia After Lung Surgery Is Associated With Persistent Alveolopleural Fistulae. Chest. 2015; 149(1):220-7. PMC: 5831571. DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-1591. View

16.

Baringer K, Talbert S . Chest drainage systems and management of air leaks after a pulmonary resection. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 9(12):5399-5403. PMC: 5756963. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.15. View

17.

Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, Salati M, Marasco R, Al Refai M . Comparison of water seal and suction after pulmonary lobectomy: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 77(6):1932-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.022. View

18.

Lijkendijk M, Licht P, Neckelmann K . The Influence of Suction on Chest Drain Duration After Lobectomy Using Electronic Chest Drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107(6):1621-1625. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.059. View

19.

Wang H, Hu W, Ma L, Zhang Y . Digital chest drainage system versus traditional chest drainage system after pulmonary resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 14(1):13. PMC: 6339372. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-019-0842-x. View

20.

Zhou L, Guo K, Shang X, E F, Xu M, Wu Y . Advantages of applying digital chest drainage system for postoperative management of patients following pulmonary resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022; 71(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s11748-022-01875-7. View