» Articles » PMID: 39548536

Towards Clinical Translation of Urinary Vitronectin for Non-invasive Detection and Monitoring of Renal Fibrosis in Kidney Transplant Patients

Abstract

Background: Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is a critical factor in the prognosis of kidney health. Currently, IFTA quantitation in kidney biopsy samples is crucial for diagnosis and assessing disease severity, but the available non-invasive biomarkers are not satisfactory. Proteomic studies identified urinary vitronectin (VTN) as a potential biomarker for kidney fibrosis. As mass spectrometry techniques are not practical for use in clinical settings, we tested whether evaluation of urinary VTN levels through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can help monitor fibrotic changes in kidney transplant recipients and prove the clinical viability of the assay.

Methods: A total of 58 kidney transplant (KTx) patients who underwent renal biopsy were included in the study. Patients were categorized into two groups referred as no fibrosis (0%) or with fibrosis (≥ 5%) based on their histological findings. In a subsequent/follow-up analysis, the time elapsed from transplantation was also considered. The urinary levels of VTN were measured using ELISA.

Results: VTN (p = 0.0180) and VTN normalized by urinary creatinine levels (p = 0.0037), were significantly increased in patients with fibrotic grafts. When focusing on patients with long-term grafts (> 3 years from transplantation, n = 36), VTN exhibited superior potential in identifying fibrotic grafts compared to albuminuria (VTN p = 0.0040 vs. albuminuria p = 0.0132). Importantly, in this group, while albuminuria correctly identified 71% of fibrotic patients, the combination of VTN plus albuminuria correctly classified 89% of fibrotic grafts detected by renal biopsy.

Conclusions: VTN has emerged as a valid indicator of renal fibrosis. Of interest, urinary levels of VTN in combination with conventional clinical parameters (such as albuminuria) significantly improved the non-invasive detection of renal fibrosis in kidney transplant patients.

References
1.
Bulow R, Boor P . Extracellular Matrix in Kidney Fibrosis: More Than Just a Scaffold. J Histochem Cytochem. 2019; 67(9):643-661. PMC: 6713975. DOI: 10.1369/0022155419849388. View

2.
Betjes M, Roelen D, van Agteren M, Kal-van Gestel J . Causes of Kidney Graft Failure in a Cohort of Recipients With a Very Long-Time Follow-Up After Transplantation. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:842419. PMC: 9207199. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.842419. View

3.
Agborbesong E, Bissler J, Li X . Liquid Biopsy at the Frontier of Kidney Diseases: Application of Exosomes in Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(7). PMC: 10379367. DOI: 10.3390/genes14071367. View

4.
Bhavsar N, Kottgen A, Coresh J, Astor B . Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) as predictors of incident CKD stage 3: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 60(2):233-40. PMC: 3399971. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.336. View

5.
Ciregia F, Deroyer C, Cobraiville G, Plener Z, Malaise O, Gillet P . Modulation of αβ integrin in osteoarthritis-related synovitis and the interaction with VTN competing for TGF-β1 activation. Exp Mol Med. 2021; 53(2):210-222. PMC: 8080589. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-021-00558-2. View