» Articles » PMID: 39536309

An Electronic Medical Record-Based Prognostic Model for Inpatient Falls: Development and Internal-External Cross-Validation

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2024 Nov 13
PMID 39536309
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Effective fall prevention interventions in hospitals require appropriate allocation of resources early in admission. To address this, fall risk prediction tools and models have been developed with the aim to provide fall prevention strategies to patients at high risk. However, fall risk assessment tools have typically been inaccurate for prediction, ineffective in prevention, and time-consuming to complete. Accurate, dynamic, individualized estimates of fall risk for admitted patients using routinely recorded data may assist in prioritizing fall prevention efforts.

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and validate an accurate and dynamic prognostic model for inpatient falls among a cohort of patients using routinely recorded electronic medical record data.

Methods: We used routinely recorded data from 5 Australian hospitals to develop and internally-externally validate a prediction model for inpatient falls using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying covariates. The study cohort included patients admitted during 2018-2021 to any ward, with no age restriction. Predictors used in the model included admission-related administrative data, length of stay, and number of previous falls during the admission (updated every 12 hours up to 14 days after admission). Model calibration was assessed using Poisson regression and discrimination using the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: There were 1,107,556 inpatient admissions, 6004 falls, and 5341 unique fallers. The area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.899 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) at 24 hours after admission and declined throughout admission (eg, 0.765, 95% CI 0.75-0.78 on the seventh day after admission). Site-dependent overestimation and underestimation of risk was observed on the calibration plots.

Conclusions: Using a large dataset from multiple hospitals and robust methods to model development and validation, we developed a prognostic model for inpatient falls. It had high discrimination, suggesting the model has the potential for operationalization in clinical decision support for prioritizing inpatients for fall prevention. Performance was site dependent, and model recalibration may lead to improved performance.

References
1.
Hou W, Kang C, Ho M, Kuo J, Chen H, Chang W . Evaluation of an inpatient fall risk screening tool to identify the most critical fall risk factors in inpatients. J Clin Nurs. 2016; 26(5-6):698-706. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13510. View

2.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S . The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39(2):142-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. View

3.
Sutton R, Pincock D, Baumgart D, Sadowski D, Fedorak R, Kroeker K . An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:17. PMC: 7005290. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. View

4.
McLernon D, Giardiello D, Van Calster B, Wynants L, van Geloven N, van Smeden M . Assessing Performance and Clinical Usefulness in Prediction Models With Survival Outcomes: Practical Guidance for Cox Proportional Hazards Models. Ann Intern Med. 2022; 176(1):105-114. DOI: 10.7326/M22-0844. View

5.
Yokota S, Ohe K . Construction and evaluation of FiND, a fall risk prediction model of inpatients from nursing data. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016; 13(2):247-55. DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12103. View