Long-term Functional Outcomes of BIFOLD Osteosynthesis in Distal Femoral Fractures with Metaphyseal Comminution: A Retrospective Analysis

Overview

Journal J Orthop

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Nov 11

PMID 39524105

Authors

Clevio Desouza

Nicholas Antao

Sanjay Londhe

Paras Banka

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes of BIFOLD osteosynthesis, employing retrograde nailing and distal femoral locked plating, in patients with distal femoral fractures and metaphyseal comminution.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated for distal femur fractures with metaphyseal comminution between 2012 and 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Inclusion criteria encompassed distal femur fractures with metaphyseal comminution, excluding specific conditions. BIFOLD osteosynthesis was employed in all 33 cases, utilizing retrograde SIGN (Surgical Implant Generation Network Nail) and distal femoral locking plates. Primary outcome measures included radiographic and functional outcomes assessed through the Sanders functional evaluation score, with secondary outcomes focusing on perioperative or postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 33 patients (21 male, 12 female) were included, with an average age of 51.4 years. BIFOLD osteosynthesis exhibited an average radiographic fracture healing time of 6.2 ± 2.5 months. The procedure's average operative time was 100 ± 15 min, and blood loss averaged 420 ± 50 ml. According to Sanders criteria, 28 patients (84.84 %) demonstrated well-to-excellent functional outcomes, while 3 patients (9.09 %) reported fair outcomes, and 2 patients (6.06 %) reported poor outcomes. No significant shortening or implant failure occurred, and all patients achieved over 90 degrees of knee range of motion within 8 weeks. One patient experienced superficial infection, and two patients exhibited insignificant coronal plane deformity.

Conclusion: BIFOLD osteosynthesis, combining intra and extra medullary fixation principles, offers a stable construct for distal femoral fractures with metaphyseal comminution. This approach facilitates faster ambulation, pain relief, early knee joint mobilization, and significant early union, resulting in improved functional outcomes. Additionally, BIFOLD osteosynthesis helps prevent collapse, translational and rotational deformities, as well as shortening.

References

Horwitz D, Kubiak E . Surgical treatment of osteoporotic fractures about the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(12):2970-82. View

Carsen S, Park S, Simon D, Feibel R . Treatment With the SIGN Nail in Closed Diaphyseal Femur Fractures Results in Acceptable Radiographic Alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(7):2394-401. PMC: 4457748. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4290-1. View

Wright D, DeSanto D, McGarry M, Lee T, Scolaro J . Supplemental Fixation of Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Dual-Plate and Plate-Nail Constructs. J Orthop Trauma. 2020; 34(8):434-440. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001749. View

Liu M, Ali S, Haonga B, Eliezer E, Albright P, Morshed S . Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Fin nail versus SIGN standard intramedullary nail for distal diaphyseal femur fractures treated via retrograde approach. Injury. 2019; 50(10):1725-1730. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.009. View

Kregor P, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, Cole P, Alonso J . Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury. 2002; 32 Suppl 3:SC32-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00182-6. View

Nasr A, Mc Leod I, Sabboubeh A, Maffulli N . Conservative or surgical management of distal femoral fractures. A retrospective study with a minimum five year follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg. 2001; 66(5):477-83. View

Delport P, Van Audekercke R, Martens M, MULIER J . Conservative treatment of ipsilateral supracondylar femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma. 1984; 24(9):846-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198409000-00013. View

Basci O, Karakasli A, Kumtepe E, Guran O, Havitcioglu H . Combination of anatomical locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures: comparison of mechanical stability. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2015; 26(1):21-6. DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2015.06. View

Schatzker J . Fractures of the distal femur revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (347):43-56. View

10.

Weng C, Wu C, Feng K, Tseng I, Lee P, Huang Y . Comparison of supraintercondylar and supracondylar femur fractures treated with condylar buttress plates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17(1):413. PMC: 5050571. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1278-2. View

11.

Heiney J, Barnett M, Vrabec G, Schoenfeld A, Baji A, Njus G . Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate. J Trauma. 2009; 66(2):443-9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815edeb8. View

12.

Beltran M, Gary J, Collinge C . Management of distal femur fractures with modern plates and nails: state of the art. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(4):165-72. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000302. View

13.

Thomson A, Driver R, Kregor P, Obremskey W . Long-term functional outcomes after intra-articular distal femur fractures: ORIF versus retrograde intramedullary nailing. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(8):748-50. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20080801-33. View

14.

Chan D, Jeffcoat D, Lorich D, Helfet D . Nonunions around the knee joint. Int Orthop. 2009; 34(2):271-81. PMC: 2899352. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0924-9. View

15.

Usoro A, Bhashyam A, Mohamadi A, Dyer G, Zirkle L, von Keudell A . Clinical Outcomes and Complications of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Intramedullary Nail: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 33(1):42-48. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001328. View

16.

Gwathmey Jr F, Jones-Quaidoo S, Kahler D, Hurwitz S, Cui Q . Distal femoral fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18(10):597-607. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201010000-00003. View

17.

Bolhofner B, Carmen B, Clifford P . The results of open reduction and Internal fixation of distal femur fractures using a biologic (indirect) reduction technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1996; 10(6):372-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199608000-00002. View

18.

Berry D . Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(2):183-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70073-0. View

19.

Pritchett J . Supracondylar fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (184):173-7. View

20.

Antao N, Londhe S, Toor R, Shirishkar R, Aiyer S . Short-term results of a novel management of supracondylar fracture with coexisting osteoarthritis with bifold fixation and total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2022; 3(1):44. PMC: 8796440. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-021-00098-0. View