» Articles » PMID: 39513962

A Tumor-Naïve CtDNA Assay Detects Minimal Residual Disease in Resected Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer and Predicts Recurrence: Subset Analysis from the GALAXY Study in CIRCULATE-Japan

Abstract

Purpose: Analysis of ctDNA may enable early identification of patients likely to relapse, presenting an opportunity for early interventions and improved outcomes. Tumor-naïve plasma-only approaches for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment accelerate turnaround time, enabling rapid treatment decisions and ongoing surveillance.

Experimental Design: Plasma samples were obtained from 80 study participants with stage II or III colorectal cancer selected from CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY. MRD status was assessed using a tumor-naïve ctDNA assay (xM) that integrates methylation and genomic variant data, delivering a binary call. MRD was assessed at 4 weeks postsurgery [landmark time point (LMT)] using methylation and genomic variant data and longitudinally (median, 22.1 months) using only methylation data.

Results: At LMT, 69/80 study participants were evaluable (36 recurrent; 33 nonrecurrent). Of recurrent study participants, 22/36 had detectable ctDNA (MRD-positive) at LMT and 29/33 nonrecurrent study participants had undetectable ctDNA (MRD-negative), yielding a clinical sensitivity of 61.1% and specificity of 87.9%. Additionally, 74 study participants were evaluable for longitudinal performance with a clinical sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 89.5%. The median lead time from the first MRD-positive result to recurrence was 4.77 months overall, and 5.30 months for study participants with no adjuvant treatment. At 12 weeks postsurgery, MRD status strongly correlated with disease-free survival (adjusted HR, 9.69), outperforming carcinoembryonic antigen correlation (HR, 2.13).

Conclusions: This tumor-naïve MRD assay demonstrated clinically meaningful performance at LMT and longitudinally, accurately predicting clinical recurrence. MRD status was a stronger prognostic biomarker for disease-free survival compared with standard-of-care carcinoembryonic antigen.

Citing Articles

Liquid Biopsy and Challenge of Assay Heterogeneity for Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Colon Cancer Treatment.

Crisafulli G Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39858618 PMC: 11765229. DOI: 10.3390/genes16010071.

References
1.
Taniguchi H, Nakamura Y, Kotani D, Yukami H, Mishima S, Sawada K . CIRCULATE-Japan: Circulating tumor DNA-guided adaptive platform trials to refine adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2021; 112(7):2915-2920. PMC: 8253296. DOI: 10.1111/cas.14926. View

2.
Chan G, Chee C . Making sense of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020; 10(6):1183-1192. PMC: 6954995. DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.06.03. View

3.
Sahin I, Lin Y, Yothers G, Lucas P, Deming D, George T . Minimal Residual Disease-Directed Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer: CIRCULATE-US. Oncology (Williston Park). 2022; 36(10):604-608. DOI: 10.46883/2022.25920976. View

4.
Yoshino T, Argiles G, Oki E, Martinelli E, Taniguchi H, Arnold D . Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis treatment and follow-up of patients with localised colon cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021; 32(12):1496-1510. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1752. View

5.
Andre T, de Gramont A, Vernerey D, Chibaudel B, Bonnetain F, Tijeras-Raballand A . Adjuvant Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Stage II to III Colon Cancer: Updated 10-Year Survival and Outcomes According to BRAF Mutation and Mismatch Repair Status of the MOSAIC Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(35):4176-87. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4238. View