Patient-specific 3D-Printed PEEK Implants for Spinal Tumor Surgery

Overview

Journal J Orthop

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Nov 8

PMID 39512487

Authors

Nikita Zaborovskii

Sergei Masevnin

Oleg Smekalenkov

Vladislav Murakhovsky

Dmitrii Ptashnikov

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims & Objectives: This study evaluates the feasibility and clinical outcomes of using 3D-printed polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants (PSI) for vertebral body replacement (VBR) in patients with spinal tumors. The research question focuses on postoperative results, implant integration, and complications over a 12-month period.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective case series analyzed five patients who underwent spinal reconstruction after tumor resection using PEEK 3D VBR between April 2022 and June 2023. Inclusion criteria were thoracic/lumbar spinal tumors, tumor resection with PEEK 3D VBR reconstruction, and follow-up exceeding 12 months. PEEK implants were created using fused filament fabrication from medical-grade PEEK. Patient data included demographics, medical history, tumor characteristics, and surgical outcomes. Radiological evaluations assessed bony fusion, local angle changes, and segment height stability. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using R software.

Results: The mean follow-up duration was 19.2 months. All patients remained alive, with one experiencing local recurrence. Postoperative imaging showed a decrease in local angle with no significant changes during follow-up. Segment heights remained stable, and no PEEK 3D VBR subsidence or hardware failure was observed. Bony fusion was observed in all patients.

Conclusions: The use of PEEK 3D printed PSI for VBR in spinal tumor patients demonstrates promising feasibility and clinical outcomes, with stable implant integration and minimal complications over a 12-month period. Further studies with larger cohorts are recommended to validate these findings.

References

Girolami M, Boriani S, Bandiera S, Barbanti-Brodano G, Ghermandi R, Terzi S . Biomimetic 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis for anterior column reconstruction in the thoracolumbar spine: a tailored option following en bloc resection for spinal tumors : Preliminary results on a case-series of 13 patients. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27(12):3073-3083. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5708-8. View

Amin T, Parr W, Mobbs R . Opinion Piece: Patient-Specific Implants May Be the Next Big Thing in Spinal Surgery. J Pers Med. 2021; 11(6). PMC: 8228233. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060498. View

Kasapovic A, Bornemann R, Pflugmacher R, Rommelspacher Y . Implants for Vertebral Body Replacement - Which Systems are Available and Have Become Established. Z Orthop Unfall. 2019; 159(1):83-90. DOI: 10.1055/a-1017-3968. View

Zhou H, Liu S, Li Z, Liu X, Dang L, Li Y . 3D-printed vertebral body for anterior spinal reconstruction in patients with thoracolumbar spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 37(2):274-282. DOI: 10.3171/2022.1.SPINE21900. View

Honigmann P, Sharma N, Okolo B, Popp U, Msallem B, Thieringer F . Patient-Specific Surgical Implants Made of 3D Printed PEEK: Material, Technology, and Scope of Surgical Application. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:4520636. PMC: 5884234. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4520636. View

Rendas P, Figueiredo L, Machado C, Mourao A, Vidal C, Soares B . Mechanical performance and bioactivation of 3D-printed PEEK for high-performance implant manufacture: a review. Prog Biomater. 2022; 12(2):89-111. PMC: 10154446. DOI: 10.1007/s40204-022-00214-6. View

Heary R, Parvathreddy N, Sampath S, Agarwal N . Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants. J Spine Surg. 2017; 3(2):163-167. PMC: 5506312. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2017.05.01. View

Warburton A, Girdler S, Mikhail C, Ahn A, Cho S . Biomaterials in Spinal Implants: A Review. Neurospine. 2019; 17(1):101-110. PMC: 7136103. DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938296.148. View

Choy W, Mobbs R, Wilcox B, Phan S, Phan K, Sutterlin 3rd C . Reconstruction of Thoracic Spine Using a Personalized 3D-Printed Vertebral Body in Adolescent with T9 Primary Bone Tumor. World Neurosurg. 2017; 105:1032.e13-1032.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.133. View

10.

Honigmann P, Sharma N, Schumacher R, Rueegg J, Haefeli M, Thieringer F . In-Hospital 3D Printed Scaphoid Prosthesis Using Medical-Grade Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Biomaterial. Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:1301028. PMC: 7815413. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1301028. View

11.

Kumar N, Alathur Ramakrishnan S, Lopez K, Madhu S, Ramos M, Fuh J . Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?. World Neurosurg. 2021; 148:94-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.059. View

12.

Hu X, Kenan S, Cheng M, Cai W, Huang W, Yan W . 3D-Printed Patient-Customized Artificial Vertebral Body for Spinal Reconstruction after Total Spondylectomy of Complex Multi-Level Spinal Tumors. Int J Bioprint. 2022; 8(3):576. PMC: 9468956. DOI: 10.18063/ijb.v8i3.576. View

13.

Limaye N, Veschini L, Coward T . Assessing biocompatibility & mechanical testing of 3D-printed PEEK versus milled PEEK. Heliyon. 2023; 8(12):e12314. PMC: 9800332. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12314. View

14.

Disch A, Schaser K, Melcher I, Feraboli F, Schmoelz W, Druschel C . Oncosurgical results of multilevel thoracolumbar en-bloc spondylectomy and reconstruction with a carbon composite vertebral body replacement system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(10):E647-55. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f8cb4e. View

15.

Basgul C, Yu T, MacDonald D, Siskey R, Marcolongo M, Kurtz S . Structure-Property Relationships for 3D printed PEEK Intervertebral Lumbar Cages Produced using Fused Filament Fabrication. J Mater Res. 2018; 33(14):2040-2051. PMC: 6289530. DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2018.178. View

16.

Schnake K, Stavridis S, Kandziora F . Five-year clinical and radiological results of combined anteroposterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 20(5):497-504. DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13246. View

17.

Shen F, Gasbarrini A, Lui D, Reynolds J, Capua J, Boriani S . Integrated Custom Composite Polyetheretherketone/Carbon fiber (PEEK/CF) Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) in the Treatment of Bone Tumors of the Spine: A Preliminary Report From a Multicenter Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 47(3):252-260. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004177. View

18.

Rendas P, Imperadeiro A, Martins R, Soares B . High-Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(1). PMC: 10781079. DOI: 10.3390/polym16010018. View

19.

Chin B, Ji T, Tang X, Yang R, Guo W . Three-Level Lumbar En Bloc Spondylectomy with Three-Dimensional-Printed Vertebrae Reconstruction for Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor. World Neurosurg. 2019; 129:531-537.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.056. View

20.

Kotrych D, Angelini A, Bohatyrewicz A, Ruggieri P . 3D printing for patient-specific implants in musculoskeletal oncology. EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8(5):331-339. PMC: 10233802. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0066. View