Children and Adolescents' Experiences of Mandatory SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Schools: a Cross-sectional Survey

Overview

Journal BMJ Paediatr Open

Publisher BMJ Publishing Group

Specialty Pediatrics

Date 2024 Nov 7

PMID 39510767

Authors

Christian Kimmig

Thorsten Langer

Johanna K Loy

Stephan Bender

Anneke Haddad

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic had dramatic consequences for children and adolescents. However, policy-makers and healthcare researchers did not give sufficient weight to children's perspectives. One common public health measure was mandatory SARS-CoV-2 tests in schools. This study examines the evaluation of such mandatory testing.

Methods: We investigated the effects of test type (pooled PCR tests vs antigen rapid tests) and demographic and psychological factors on evaluations of the experience of being tested. A total of 569 children (8-17 years) in two major German cities completed online questionnaires between October and December 2021. Participants answered questions addressing test evaluation, vaccination status, pandemic-related stress, mental health difficulties and health-related quality of life.

Results: Our results showed that overall test ratings were better for pooled PCR tests (p<0.001). Vaccine-willing students evaluated SARS-CoV-2 tests more positively than vaccine-unwilling students, regardless of test type (p<0.001). Children with mental health difficulties (abnormal/borderline Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores) evaluated SARS-CoV-2 tests more negatively than children with normal SDQ scores (p<0.001). Additionally, children who reported better health-related quality of life and children with less pandemic-related stress rated the tests more positively.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that there are differences in the appraisal of the test types and that specific subgroups' experiences of regular testing vary. Our study provides insights for policy-makers in future pandemics and raises questions regarding parallels between testing and vaccination hesitancy. Moreover, our study demonstrates the feasibility and value of collecting data directly from a large cohort of children in order to understand their experiences.

References

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

Fallucchi F, Gorges L, Machado J, Pieters A, Suhrcke M . How to make universal, voluntary testing for COVID-19 work? A behavioural economics perspective. Health Policy. 2021; 125(8):972-980. PMC: 8450724. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.003. View

Wu F, Yuan Y, Li Y, Yin D, Lang B, Zhao Y . The acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-testing: A cross-sectional study in China. J Med Virol. 2022; 95(1):e28227. PMC: 9874789. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28227. View

Nivette A, Ribeaud D, Murray A, Steinhoff A, Bechtiger L, Hepp U . Non-compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures among young adults in Switzerland: Insights from a longitudinal cohort study. Soc Sci Med. 2020; 268:113370. PMC: 7493799. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113370. View

Loy J, Kimmig C, Klos S, Wunram H, Langer T, Breitinger E . Influence parental- and child-related factors on the acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 test methods in schools and daycare facilities. Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1264019. PMC: 11291219. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1264019. View

Schuster J, Potts J, Selvarangan R, Keener Mast D, Goldman J . A COVID-19 Testing Preference Study in Schools. Pediatrics. 2023; 152(Suppl 1). PMC: 10312271. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352H. View

Calvin C, Deary I, Fenton C, Roberts B, Der G, Leckenby N . Intelligence in youth and all-cause-mortality: systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 40(3):626-44. PMC: 3147066. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq190. View

Goodman R . Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001; 40(11):1337-45. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015. View

Mulkey S, Bearer C, Molloy E . Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children relate to the child's age and experience. Pediatr Res. 2023; 94(5):1586-1587. PMC: 10242215. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02681-4. View

10.

Bevan I, Stage Baxter M, Stagg H, Street A . Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Related to COVID-19 Testing: A Rapid Scoping Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(9). PMC: 8472251. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091685. View

11.

Denford S, Towler L, Ali B, Treneman-Evans G, Bloomer R, Peto T . Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: a qualitative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):742. PMC: 9007577. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13204-x. View

12.

Jones K, Patel N, Levy M, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman J . Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008; 451(7181):990-3. PMC: 5960580. DOI: 10.1038/nature06536. View

13.

Dopfner M, Adam J, Habbel C, Schulte B, Schulze-Husmann K, Simons M . [The mental burden of children, adolescents, and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with emotional and behavioral problems]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021; 64(12):1522-1532. PMC: 8576319. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03455-1. View

14.

Viner R, Russell S, Croker H, Packer J, Ward J, Stansfield C . School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020; 4(5):397-404. PMC: 7270629. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X. View

15.

Polechova J, Johnson K, Payne P, Crozier A, Beiglbock M, Plevka P . SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests provide benefits for epidemic control - observations from Austrian schools. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022; 145:14-19. PMC: 8760838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.002. View

16.

Fiordelli M, Rubinelli S, Diviani N . Acceptance of Public Health Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Swiss Population's Beliefs, Attitudes, Trust, and Information-Seeking Behavior. Int J Public Health. 2023; 68:1605982. PMC: 10318558. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605982. View

17.

Pourrazavi S, Fathifar Z, Sharma M, Allahverdipour H . COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A Systematic review of cognitive determinants. Health Promot Perspect. 2023; 13(1):21-35. PMC: 10257562. DOI: 10.34172/hpp.2023.03. View

18.

Jorgensen E, Wood L, Lynch M, Spencer N, Gunnlaugsson G . Child Rights during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning from Child Health-and-Rights Professionals across the World. Children (Basel). 2023; 10(10). PMC: 10605735. DOI: 10.3390/children10101670. View

19.

Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Auquier P, Bruil J . Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19(10):1487-500. PMC: 2977059. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5. View

20.

Marani M, Katul G, Pan W, Parolari A . Intensity and frequency of extreme novel epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(35). PMC: 8536331. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2105482118. View