Acceptance of Public Health Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Swiss Population's Beliefs, Attitudes, Trust, and Information-Seeking Behavior

Overview

Journal Int J Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2023 Jul 6

PMID 37408794

Authors

Maddalena Fiordelli

Sara Rubinelli

Nicola Diviani

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study aimed to advance the understanding of the factors associated with population acceptance of public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. In January 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of the Swiss population ( = 2,587). Questionnaires were administered through computer-assisted web interviewing. Measures covered included information-seeking behavior, attitudes towards and beliefs about public health measures enacted, and trust in institutions. Television and newspapers were the most used information sources. Those with higher education levels were more likely to use channels from public institutions, newspapers, and television. The most important criterion for reliable information was scientific evidence. Trust was highest for doctors, healthcare workers, universities, research institutes, and public health institutions. Acceptance of public health measures was high overall, and attitudes, beliefs, information-seeking behavior, and trust were positively related to acceptance. Trust in science remained stable, while trust in public health institutions decreased slightly. While nurturing a two-way dialogue with the population, institutions should target communication considering age and culture, improve risk communication, ground messages in scientific evidence, and ensure mass media presence.

Citing Articles

Children and adolescents' experiences of mandatory SARS-CoV-2 testing in schools: a cross-sectional survey.

Kimmig C, Langer T, Loy J, Bender S, Haddad A BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024; 8(1).

PMID: 39510767 PMC: 11551996. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002974.

Absence of short-term changes in knowledge and attitudes among household contacts of COVID-19 cases during the post-acute phase of the pandemic in Catalonia and Navarre, Spain.

Bullon-Vela V, Toledo D, Echeverria A, Godoy P, Garcia Cenoz M, Parron I Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1306284.

PMID: 38487191 PMC: 10937404. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1306284.

References

Reynolds R, Weaver S, Nyman A, Eriksen M . Trust in COVID-19 information sources and perceived risk among smokers: A nationally representative survey. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262097. PMC: 8794215. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262097. View

Kreps S, Goldfarb J, Brownstein J, Kriner D . The Relationship between US Adults' Misconceptions about COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination Preferences. Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(8). PMC: 8402532. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080901. View

Fridman I, Lucas N, Henke D, Zigler C . Association Between Public Knowledge About COVID-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020; 6(3):e22060. PMC: 7511226. DOI: 10.2196/22060. View

Yang Q, Chen Y, Wendorf Muhamad J . Social Support, Trust in Health Information, and Health Information-Seeking Behaviors (HISBs): A Study Using the 2012 Annenberg National Health Communication Survey (ANHCS). Health Commun. 2016; 32(9):1142-1150. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1214220. View

Gehrau V, Fujarski S, Lorenz H, Schieb C, Blobaum B . The Impact of Health Information Exposure and Source Credibility on COVID-19 Vaccination Intention in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(9). PMC: 8124400. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094678. View

Vaughan E, Tinker T . Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99 Suppl 2:S324-32. PMC: 4504362. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537. View

Camerini A, Schulz P . Patients' need for information provision and perceived participation in decision making in doctor-patient consultation: Micro-cultural differences between French- and Italian-speaking Switzerland. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 99(3):462-469. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.018. View

Nowak B, Miedziarek C, Pelczynski S, Rzymski P . Misinformation, Fears and Adherence to Preventive Measures during the Early Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(22). PMC: 8618240. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212266. View

Bearth A, Luchsinger L, Siegrist M . Reactions of older Swiss adults to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal survey on the acceptance of and adherence to public health measures. Soc Sci Med. 2021; 280:114039. PMC: 8129997. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114039. View

10.

Siegrist M, Bearth A . Worldviews, trust, and risk perceptions shape public acceptance of COVID-19 public health measures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(24). PMC: 8214671. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2100411118. View

11.

Travaglino G, Moon C . Compliance and Self-Reporting During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Cultural Study of Trust and Self-Conscious Emotions in the United States, Italy, and South Korea. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:565845. PMC: 8007877. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565845. View

12.

Freiling I, Krause N, Scheufele D . Science and Ethics of "Curing" Misinformation. AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(3):E228-237. DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.228. View

13.

Iyengar S, Massey D . Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 116(16):7656-7661. PMC: 6475392. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. View

14.

De Gani S, Berger F, Guggiari E, Jaks R . Relation of corona-specific health literacy to use of and trust in information sources during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):42. PMC: 8735736. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12271-w. View

15.

Earnshaw V, Eaton L, Kalichman S, Brousseau N, Hill E, Fox A . COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support. Transl Behav Med. 2020; 10(4):850-856. PMC: 7499784. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa090. View

16.

Fischhoff B . The sciences of science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110 Suppl 3:14033-9. PMC: 3752164. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213273110. View

17.

Rubinelli S, Purnat T, Wilhelm E, Traicoff D, Namageyo-Funa A, Thomson A . WHO competency framework for health authorities and institutions to manage infodemics: its development and features. Hum Resour Health. 2022; 20(1):35. PMC: 9077350. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-022-00733-0. View

18.

Sachs J, Abdool Karim S, Aknin L, Allen J, Brosbol K, Colombo F . The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2022; 400(10359):1224-1280. PMC: 9539542. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9. View

19.

Franzen A, Wohner F . Fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of social distancing adherence from a panel study of young adults in Switzerland. PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261276. PMC: 8664223. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261276. View

20.

Chaiken S, Maheswaran D . Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(3):460-73. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.3.460. View