» Articles » PMID: 39507904

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Feeding Intolerance in Neurocritical Patients with Enteral Nutrition

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2024 Nov 7
PMID 39507904
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study collects and analyzes clinical data on enteral nutrition therapy in neurocritical patients, develops and validates a feeding intolerance (FI) risk prediction model, and provides a theoretical basis for screening patients with high risk of feeding intolerance (FI) and delivering personalized care.

Methods: A convenience sampling method was employed to select 300 patients who were admitted to a tertiary hospital in China for early enteral nutrition therapy in the neurointensive care unit between April 2022 and December 2022. Independent risk factors for FI were identified using univariate and logistic regression analyses. A prediction model was established, and the goodness of fit and discriminant validity of the model were evaluated.

Results: The incidence of FI in neurocritical patients receiving enteral nutrition was 71%. Logistic regression analysis identified age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, mechanical ventilation, feeding via the nasogastric tube route, hyperglycemia, and low serum albumin as independent risk factors for the development of FI ( < 0.05). The predictive formula for FI risk was established as follows: Logit  = -14.737 + 1.184 × mechanical ventilation +2.309 × feeding route +1.650 × age + 1.336 × GCS tertile (6-8 points) + 1.696 × GCS tertile (3-5 points) + 1.753 × APACHE II score + 1.683 × blood glucose value +1.954 × serum albumin concentration. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed  = 9.622,  = 0.293, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.941 (95% confidence interval: 0.912-0.970, < 0.001). The optimal critical value was 0.767, with a sensitivity of 85.9%, a specificity of 90.8%, and a Youden index of 0.715.

Conclusion: The early enteral nutrition FI risk prediction model developed in this study demonstrated good predictive ability. This model can serve as a valuable reference for effectively assessing the risk of FI in neurocritical patients, thereby enhancing clinical outcomes.

References
1.
Singer P, Reintam Blaser A, Berger M, Alhazzani W, Calder P, Casaer M . ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2018; 38(1):48-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. View

2.
Yuan T, He H, Liu Y, Wang J, Kang X, Fu G . Association between blood glucose levels and Glasgow Outcome Score in patients with traumatic brain injury: secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Trials. 2022; 23(1):38. PMC: 8760745. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06005-5. View

3.
Sekino M, Funaoka H, Sato S, Okada K, Inoue H, Yano R . Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein level as a predictor of 28-day mortality and bowel ischemia in patients with septic shock: A preliminary study. J Crit Care. 2017; 42:92-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.07.012. View

4.
Mi Y, Huang H, Shang Y, Shao X, Huang P, Xiang C . [Expert consensus on prevention and management of enteral nutrition therapy complications for critically ill patients in China (2021 edition)]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021; 33(8):903-917. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210310-00357. View

5.
Moheet A, Livesay S, Abdelhak T, Bleck T, Human T, Karanjia N . Standards for Neurologic Critical Care Units: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from The Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care. 2018; 29(2):145-160. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-018-0601-1. View