» Articles » PMID: 39504756

Influence of Cocaine Use Reduction on Markers of Immune Function

Abstract

This study determined the effects of reduced cocaine use on immune function. Treatment seeking participants with Cocaine Use Disorder enrolled in a 12-week contingency management trial to reduce cocaine use. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to High Value Reinforcers (i.e., $55/negative urine sample) for cocaine abstinence (n = 41), Low Value Reinforcers (i.e., $13/negative urine sample) for cocaine abstinence (n = 33) or Non-Contingent Control (n = 33). Immune measures were collected at 6-week intervals. The High Value group had greatest use reductions, increased erythema and IL-6 and decreased IL-10 and CCL5, suggesting an activated immune response. Cocaine use reduction may promote changes in immune health.

References
1.
Feng F, Thompson M, Thomas B, Duffy E, Kim J, Kurosawa S . A computational solution to improve biomarker reproducibility during long-term projects. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0209060. PMC: 6469750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209060. View

2.
Funchal G, Schuch J, Zaparte A, Sanvicente-Vieira B, Viola T, Grassi-Oliveira R . Cocaine-use disorder and childhood maltreatment are associated with the activation of neutrophils and increased inflammation. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2023; 36(2):97-108. DOI: 10.1017/neu.2023.11. View

3.
Van Dyke C, Stesin A, Jones R, Chuntharapai A, Seaman W . Cocaine increases natural killer cell activity. J Clin Invest. 1986; 77(4):1387-90. PMC: 424504. DOI: 10.1172/JCI112445. View

4.
Anthony J, Vlahov D, Nelson K, Cohn S, Astemborski J, Solomon L . New evidence on intravenous cocaine use and the risk of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 134(10):1175-89. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116021. View

5.
Tardelli V, Bisaga A, Arcadepani F, Gerra G, Levin F, Fidalgo T . Prescription psychostimulants for the treatment of stimulant use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020; 237(8):2233-2255. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-020-05563-3. View