» Articles » PMID: 39502750

The Effectiveness of Triton Used With XP-3D Adaptive Files and Active Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal During Root Canal Preparation: A Qualitative Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Study

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Nov 6
PMID 39502750
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Standard irrigating protocols during root canal treatment call for the use of sodium hypochlorite during chemo-mechanical preparation, followed by final irrigation with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). This study determined the effectiveness of a new irrigant, Triton (Brasseler, USA), on smear layer removal during root canal treatment compared to that of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and CanalPro EDTA 17% (Coltene).

Methodology: Twenty-one extracted anterior teeth were prepared for root canal treatment. The teeth were divided into three groups: five teeth were used as control with saline as the irrigant, eight teeth with sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA as irrigants, and eight teeth with Triton as the irrigant. Root canal preparation was done using the XP-3D shaper and finisher files (Brasseler, USA) for all teeth with respective irrigants. A single operator performed all root canal treatment procedures. The teeth were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and analysis was performed by a second investigator. The smear layer removal was qualitatively assessed to determine the effectiveness of irrigants.

Results: Smear layer removal was most effective for teeth irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, followed by 17% EDTA (Group B). Teeth irrigated with Triton (Group A) showed a similar appearance to the hypochlorite/EDTA group but with isolated instances of inter-tubular debris.

Conclusion: Sodium hypochlorite use followed by a final rinse with EDTA remains the gold standard for the removal of the smear layer created during canal instrumentation.

References
1.
Baumgartner J, Ibay A . The chemical reactions of irrigants used for root canal debridement. J Endod. 1987; 13(2):47-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80153-X. View

2.
Blank-Goncalves L, Nabeshima C, Martins G, Machado M . Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems. J Endod. 2011; 37(9):1268-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.009. View

3.
Gu L, Kim J, Ling J, Choi K, Pashley D, Tay F . Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009; 35(6):791-804. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010. View

4.
Zancan R, Di Maio A, Tomson P, Duarte M, Camilleri J . The presence of smear layer affects the antimicrobial action of root canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2021; 54(8):1369-1382. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13522. View

5.
McComb D, Smith D . A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod. 1975; 1(7):238-42. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3. View