» Articles » PMID: 33763882

The Presence of Smear Layer Affects the Antimicrobial Action of Root Canal Sealers

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Mar 25
PMID 33763882
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To assess the chemical and microstructural characteristics of dentine after the use of two irrigation protocols and correlate this with the antimicrobial properties of hydraulic calcium silicate cement (HCSC) sealers and changes to the dentine structure/chemistry after sealer placement.

Methodology: Two irrigation protocols - Protocol A using 2% NaOCl used 5 mL/5 min and Protocol B with 2% NaOCl (5 mL/5 min) followed by 17% EDTA (5 mL/3 min) - were used to prepare dentine. The chemical and microstructural changes following irrigation were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (n = 5) on dentine obtained from the mid-root and coronal parts of extracted human teeth. Four sealers (AH Plus, BioRoot, MTA Fillapex, TotalFill) were characterized by SEM/EDS (n = 3). The ability of the sealers to eradicate intratubular Enterococcus faecalis biofilms was assessed by live/dead dye and confocal laser scanning microscopy to measure the percentage of living cells. The effect of combined irrigation and root filling on dentine was assessed by SEM and EDS analysis (n = 5). Statistical analysis was undertaken using one-way anova and a number of post hoc tests to detect intergroup differences. The F-test was used for comparison of variances in the microbiology testing.

Results: The use of NaOCl alone left the smear layer intact, with traces of chlorine remaining on dentine. The use of BioRoot sealer restored the calcium levels of dentine which had been depleted by the irrigation with EDTA. BioRoot exhibited antimicrobial properties against intratubular bacteria even in the presence of smear layer (Protocol A). Smear layer removal improved the bactericidal effect of all sealers and Ca leaching. The use of a chelating agent was important for the intratubular sealer penetration for AH Plus but not the other sealers.

Conclusion: The removal of smear layer was necessary for penetration of AH Plus into the dentinal tubules. BioRoot was a more effective sealer in reducing the bacterial load in the dentinal tubules than the other materials tested and the presence of smear layer did not affect its activity.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the efficiency of smear layer removal during endodontic treatment using scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.

Razumova S, Brago A, Kryuchkova A, Troitskiy V, Bragunova R, Barakat H BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):151.

PMID: 39875846 PMC: 11776335. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05510-8.


Assessment of a Light-Curable Hydrogel to Be Used for Root Canal Obturation.

Bhandari S, Kuehne S, Camilleri J J Dent Res. 2024; 104(3):260-269.

PMID: 39673492 PMC: 11843793. DOI: 10.1177/00220345241287504.


The Effectiveness of Triton Used With XP-3D Adaptive Files and Active Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal During Root Canal Preparation: A Qualitative Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Study.

Bandoo C, Suliman S, Trestrail E, Marchan S Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73057.

PMID: 39502750 PMC: 11537186. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73057.


Antibiofilm Efficacy of Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.

Ruiz-Linares M, Fedoseev V, Solana C, Munoz-Sandoval C, Ferrer-Luque C Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).

PMID: 39203118 PMC: 11355656. DOI: 10.3390/ma17163937.


Impact of different agitation methods on smear layer cleaning of mesial canals with accentuated curvature.

Cordova A, Alcalde M, Klymus M, Bonjardim L, Vivan R, Duarte M Restor Dent Endod. 2024; 49(2):e12.

PMID: 38841384 PMC: 11148408. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e12.