» Articles » PMID: 39497508

Long-term Effects of Non-pharmacological Interventions in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Nursing
Date 2024 Nov 5
PMID 39497508
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Consistent diabetes control is crucial for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to prevent diabetic complications. Analyzing the long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions can improve diabetes management.

Aim: To examine the long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions in adolescents and young adults with T1D through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: The searches, without any year limitations, were conducted in seven databases. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and risk of bias assessments. The meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.4 program and R Studio. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024503185).

Results: A total of 40 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 28 were included in the meta-analysis. Notably, non-pharmacological interventions were effective in improving glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 months and self-care at >12 months of follow-up. Subgroup analyses revealed that combined interventions encompassing self-care behavior management, education, and psychological interventions could enhance self-care. Additionally, a combination of face-to-face and telephonic communication was effective in improving HbA1c.

Linking Evidence To Action: Non-pharmacological interventions are effective in improving HbA1c levels and self-care in adolescents and young adults undergoing long-term treatment. However, few studies have analyzed their effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Future studies should investigate the long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions.

Citing Articles

Long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lee D, Lee H, Lee M, Park G Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024; 21(6):665-677.

PMID: 39497508 PMC: 11655730. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12751.

References
1.
Hood K, Iturralde E, Rausch J, Weissberg-Benchell J . Preventing Diabetes Distress in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Results 1 Year After Participation in the STePS Program. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(8):1623-1630. PMC: 6054495. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-2556. View

2.
Chatzakis C, Floros D, Papagianni M, Tsiroukidou K, Kosta K, Vamvakis A . The Beneficial Effect of the Mobile Application in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019; 21(11):627-634. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0170. View

3.
Tuomaala A, Hero M, Tuomisto M, Lahteenmaki M, Miettinen P, Laine T . Motivational Interviewing and Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:639507. PMC: 7994365. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.639507. View

4.
Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T . Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016; 27(6):1785-1805. DOI: 10.1177/0962280216669183. View

5.
Salem M, AboElAsrar M, Elbarbary N, ElHilaly R, Refaat Y . Is exercise a therapeutic tool for improvement of cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus? A randomised controlled trial. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010; 2(1):47. PMC: 3238209. DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-47. View