Key Contextual Factors Involved with Participation in Medical and Genomic Screening and Research for African American and White Americans: a Qualitative Inquiry

Overview

Journal J Community Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Nov 4

PMID 39495399

Authors

Crystal Lederhos Smith

B Connor Stark

McKenna Kobalter

Mary Carol Barks

Mariko Nakano-Okuno

Ellen Wager Romesburg

Nita Limdi

Thomas May

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Tremendous progress has been made promoting diversity in recruitment for genomic research, yet challenges remain for several racial demographics. Research has cited intertwined fears of racial discrimination and medical mistrust as contributing factors. This study aimed to identify key factors to establishing trust in medical and genomic screening and research among African Americans and White Americans. Participants completed online focus groups and resulting transcripts were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach, with content analysis methods based on recommendations by Schreier. Fifteen African Americans and twenty-three White Americans participated in the study, 63% of which were female. The mean age of participants was 38.5 (SD = 16.6). The Overarching Theme of Trust is Context Dependent was identified, along with the following five themes describing elements influencing trustworthiness for our participants: (1) Professional Experience, Education, and Training Bolster Trust; (2) Trust Depends on Relationships; (3) Cross-checking Provided Information is Influential in Establishing Trust; (4) Trust is Undermined by Lack of Objectivity and Bias; and (5) Racism is an Embedded Concern and a Medical Trust Limiting Component for African Americans. To effectively address mistrust and promote recruitment of diverse participants, genomic research initiatives must be communicated in a manner that resonates with the specific diverse communities targeted. Our results suggest key factors influencing trust that should be attended to if we are to promote equity appropriately and respectfully by engaging diverse populations in genomic research.

References

Fisher E, Pratt R, Esch R, Kocher M, Wilson K, Lee W . The role of race and ethnicity in views toward and participation in genetic studies and precision medicine research in the United States: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019; 8(2):e1099. PMC: 7005620. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1099. View

May T . Are Public Repository Requirements Exacerbating Lack of Diversity?. Trends Genet. 2020; 36(6):390-394. PMC: 7372716. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.03.004. View

Gopichandran V, Chetlapalli S . Factors influencing trust in doctors: a community segmentation strategy for quality improvement in healthcare. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(12):e004115. PMC: 3855707. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004115. View

Reilly P . Eugenics and Involuntary Sterilization: 1907-2015. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015; 16:351-68. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930. View

Yeh V, Bergner E, Bruce M, Kripalani S, Mitrani V, Ogunsola T . Can Precision Medicine Actually Help People Like Me? African American and Hispanic Perspectives on the Benefits and Barriers of Precision Medicine. Ethn Dis. 2020; 30(Suppl 1):149-158. PMC: 7138449. DOI: 10.18865/ed.30.S1.149. View

Sandelowski M . Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23(4):334-40. DOI: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g. View

Johnson V, Powell-Young Y, Torres E, Spruill I . A systematic review of strategies that increase the recruitment and retention of African American adults in genetic and genomic studies. ABNF J. 2011; 22(4):84-8. PMC: 3439996. View

Martin A, Kanai M, Kamatani Y, Okada Y, Neale B, Daly M . Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet. 2019; 51(4):584-591. PMC: 6563838. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x. View

Nicol D, Critchley C, McWhirter R, Whitton T . Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources. Soc Sci Med. 2016; 162:79-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.028. View

10.

Powell L . Eugenics and equality: does the Constitution allow policies designed to discourage reproduction among disfavored groups?. Yale Law Policy Rev. 2004; 20(2):481-512. View

11.

Ioannidis J, Ntzani E, Trikalinos T . 'Racial' differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. Nat Genet. 2004; 36(12):1312-8. DOI: 10.1038/ng1474. View

12.

Sirugo G, Williams S, Tishkoff S . The Missing Diversity in Human Genetic Studies. Cell. 2019; 177(1):26-31. PMC: 7380073. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.048. View

13.

Benkert R, Peters R, Clark R, Keves-Foster K . Effects of perceived racism, cultural mistrust and trust in providers on satisfaction with care. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006; 98(9):1532-40. PMC: 2569718. View

14.

Cohn E, Husamudeen M, Larson E, Williams J . Increasing participation in genomic research and biobanking through community-based capacity building. J Genet Couns. 2014; 24(3):491-502. PMC: 4815899. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9768-6. View

15.

Oh S, Galanter J, Thakur N, Pino-Yanes M, Barcelo N, White M . Diversity in Clinical and Biomedical Research: A Promise Yet to Be Fulfilled. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(12):e1001918. PMC: 4679830. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001918. View

16.

May T, Bogar S, Spellecy R, Kabasenche W, Craig J, Dick D . Community-Based Participatory Research and its Potential Role in Supporting Diversity in Genomic Science. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021; 32(3):1208-1224. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0127. View

17.

James R, Yu J, Henrikson N, Bowen D, Fullerton S . Strategies and stakeholders: minority recruitment in cancer genetics research. Community Genet. 2008; 11(4):241-9. DOI: 10.1159/000116878. View

18.

Ademuyiwa F, Salyer P, Ma Y, Fisher S, Colditz G, Weilbaecher K . Assessing the effectiveness of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network genetic testing guidelines in identifying African American breast cancer patients with deleterious genetic mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 178(1):151-159. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05359-w. View

19.

Mapes B, Foster C, Kusnoor S, Epelbaum M, AuYoung M, Jenkins G . Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0234962. PMC: 7329113. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234962. View

20.

Shim J, Foti N, Vasquez E, Fullerton S, Bentz M, Jeske M . Community Engagement in Precision Medicine Research: Organizational Practices and Their Impacts for Equity. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023; 14(4):185-196. PMC: 10615663. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2201478. View