» Articles » PMID: 25228357

Increasing Participation in Genomic Research and Biobanking Through Community-based Capacity Building

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Sep 18
PMID 25228357
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Achieving equitable minority representation in genomic biobanking is one of the most difficult challenges faced by researchers today. Capacity building--a framework for research that includes collaborations and on-going engagement--can be used to help researchers, clinicians and communities better understand the process, utility, and clinical application of genomic science. The purpose of this exploratory descriptive study was to examine factors that influence the decision to participate in genomic research, and identify essential components of capacity building with a community at risk of being under-represented in biobanks. Results of focus groups conducted in Central Harlem with 46 participants were analyzed by a collaborative team of community and academic investigators using content analysis and AtlisTi. Key themes identified were: (1) the potential contribution of biobanking to individual and community health, for example the effect of the environment on health, (2) the societal context of the science, such as DNA criminal databases and paternity testing, that may affect the decision to participate, and (3) the researchers' commitment to community health as an outcome of capacity building. These key factors can contribute to achieving equity in biobank participation, and guide genetic specialists in biobank planning and implementation.

Citing Articles

Striving Towards Equity in Cardiovascular Genomics Research.

Jurado Velez J, Anderson N, Datcher I, Foster C, Jackson P, Hidalgo B Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025; 27(1):34.

PMID: 39964583 PMC: 11836143. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-025-01277-z.


Key contextual factors involved with participation in medical and genomic screening and research for African American and White Americans: a qualitative inquiry.

Smith C, Stark B, Kobalter M, Barks M, Nakano-Okuno M, Romesburg E J Community Genet. 2024; 15(6):723-733.

PMID: 39495399 PMC: 11645391. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00747-2.


A conceptual analysis of public opinion regarding genome research in Japan.

Shahrier S, Gaydarska H, Takashima K, Yoshizawa G, Minari J Front Genet. 2023; 14:1170794.

PMID: 38098474 PMC: 10720899. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1170794.


Community Engagement in Precision Medicine Research: Organizational Practices and Their Impacts for Equity.

Shim J, Foti N, Vasquez E, Fullerton S, Bentz M, Jeske M AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023; 14(4):185-196.

PMID: 37126431 PMC: 10615663. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2201478.


Beliefs and willingness towards participating in genetic testing for depression in low-income and racial/ethnic minority mothers at-risk.

Atkins R, Kelly T, Johnson S, Deatrick J, Wunnenberg M, Joseph P Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022; 41:153-165.

PMID: 36428043 PMC: 11036348. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2022.07.002.


References
1.
Gill P, Plumridge G, Khunti K, Greenfield S . Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in cardiovascular research: a semi-structured interview study. Fam Pract. 2012; 30(2):233-41. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cms054. View

2.
Hall M, Olopade O . Disparities in genetic testing: thinking outside the BRCA box. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(14):2197-203. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.5889. View

3.
Nisbet M, Fahy D . Bioethics in popular science: evaluating the media impact of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks on the biobank debate. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14:10. PMC: 3598530. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-10. View

4.
Pashayan N, Hall A, Chowdhury S, Dent T, Pharoah P, Burton H . Public health genomics and personalized prevention: lessons from the COGS project. J Intern Med. 2013; 274(5):451-6. PMC: 4283043. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12094. View

5.
Pang T . Genomics for public health improvement: relevant international ethical and policy issues around genome-wide association studies and biobanks. Public Health Genomics. 2013; 16(1-2):69-72. DOI: 10.1159/000341500. View