» Articles » PMID: 39488205

AI-empowered Perturbation Proteomics for Complex Biological Systems

Overview
Journal Cell Genom
Date 2024 Nov 2
PMID 39488205
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The insufficient availability of comprehensive protein-level perturbation data is impeding the widespread adoption of systems biology. In this perspective, we introduce the rationale, essentiality, and practicality of perturbation proteomics. Biological systems are perturbed with diverse biological, chemical, and/or physical factors, followed by proteomic measurements at various levels, including changes in protein expression and turnover, post-translational modifications, protein interactions, transport, and localization, along with phenotypic data. Computational models, employing traditional machine learning or deep learning, identify or predict perturbation responses, mechanisms of action, and protein functions, aiding in therapy selection, compound design, and efficient experiment design. We propose to outline a generic PMMP (perturbation, measurement, modeling to prediction) pipeline and build foundation models or other suitable mathematical models based on large-scale perturbation proteomic data. Finally, we contrast modeling between artificially and naturally perturbed systems and highlight the importance of perturbation proteomics for advancing our understanding and predictive modeling of biological systems.

Citing Articles

Mass-spectrometry-based proteomics: from single cells to clinical applications.

Guo T, Steen J, Mann M Nature. 2025; 638(8052):901-911.

PMID: 40011722 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08584-0.

References
1.
Litichevskiy L, Peckner R, Abelin J, Asiedu J, Creech A, Davis J . A Library of Phosphoproteomic and Chromatin Signatures for Characterizing Cellular Responses to Drug Perturbations. Cell Syst. 2018; 6(4):424-443.e7. PMC: 5951639. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.03.012. View

2.
Gavriilidis G, Vasileiou V, Orfanou A, Ishaque N, Psomopoulos F . A mini-review on perturbation modelling across single-cell omic modalities. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:1886-1896. PMC: 11076269. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.058. View

3.
van Esbroeck A, Janssen A, Cognetta 3rd A, Ogasawara D, Shpak G, van der Kroeg M . Activity-based protein profiling reveals off-target proteins of the FAAH inhibitor BIA 10-2474. Science. 2017; 356(6342):1084-1087. PMC: 5641481. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf7497. View

4.
Molinelli E, Korkut A, Wang W, Miller M, Gauthier N, Jing X . Perturbation biology: inferring signaling networks in cellular systems. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(12):e1003290. PMC: 3868523. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003290. View

5.
Leutert M, Barente A, Fukuda N, Rodriguez-Mias R, Villen J . The regulatory landscape of the yeast phosphoproteome. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2023; 30(11):1761-1773. PMC: 10841839. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-01115-3. View