» Articles » PMID: 39482097

Pharmacodynamics of 2 Dosages of Orally Administered Esomeprazole in Client-owned, Healthy Dogs: A Prospective, Crossover Study

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 31
PMID 39482097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Esomeprazole use is increasing in dogs, but the gastrointestinal adverse events associated with q12h dosing necessitate pharmacodynamic evaluation of a reduced dose and frequency of administration.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 2 doses of (q24h) esomeprazole in raising intragastric pH in dogs.

Animals: Nine healthy, client-owned dogs, >20 kg.

Methods: Prospective, randomized, double blinded, crossover study. Esomeprazole (0.5 or 1 mg/kg q24h) was orally administered for up to 5 days per treatment arm, and the mean percentage time intragastric pH was ≥3 (MPT3) and ≥4 (MPT4) for 24 hours periods were compared to pretreatment pH using a continuous pH monitoring system. Dogs failing to reach pH goals (MPT3 ≥75%, MPT4 ≥66%) with once daily dosing received esomeprazole 1 mg/kg PO q12h to determine if a higher dose would improve acid suppression.

Results: No significant difference in the MPT3 or MPT4 was identified between treatments for any time point (P > .05). Both doses increased the MPT pH ≥3 and 4 median [range] (0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg) on days 1 (MPT3: 76.8% [44-100], 69.2% [28.2-100]; MPT4: 65.6% [16.7-99.3], 54.9% [14.9-93.3]; P = .0009) and 2 (MPT3:77.2% [27.4-100], 75.4% [49.4-89.5]; MPT4: 66.3% [15.5-100], 59.7% [33.8-81.2]; P = .0005) of PPI treatment compared to pretreatment (MPT3: 58.3% [0.02-93.9], 52.6% [6.1-94.7]; MPT4: 25.2% [0-86.8], 32.4% [1.8-89.3]). Six dogs (66%, [0.36, 0.97]) reached pH goals established in humans with q24h dosing.

Conclusions And Clinical Importance: Both q24h PO esomeprazole doses were effective in raising intragastric pH, despite high intersubject variability, but 33% of dogs required q12h dosing to reach pH goals.

Citing Articles

Pharmacodynamics of 2 dosages of orally administered esomeprazole in client-owned, healthy dogs: A prospective, crossover study.

Ostronic A, Gremillion C, Zhang S, Steiner J, Tolbert M, Gould E J Vet Intern Med. 2024; 38(6):3235-3241.

PMID: 39482097 PMC: 11586559. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17233.

References
1.
Tolbert K, Bissett S, King A, Davidson G, Papich M, Peters E . Efficacy of oral famotidine and 2 omeprazole formulations for the control of intragastric pH in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2010; 25(1):47-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0651.x. View

2.
Bell N, BURGET D, Howden C, Wilkinson J, Hunt R . Appropriate acid suppression for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion. 1992; 51 Suppl 1:59-67. DOI: 10.1159/000200917. View

3.
Hwang J, Jeong J, Song G, Koo T, Seo K . Pharmacokinetics and Acid Suppressant Efficacy of Esomeprazole after Intravenous, Oral, and Subcutaneous Administration to Healthy Beagle Dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2017; 31(3):743-750. PMC: 5435062. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.14713. View

4.
Marks S, Kook P, Papich M, Tolbert M, Willard M . ACVIM consensus statement: Support for rational administration of gastrointestinal protectants to dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2018; 32(6):1823-1840. PMC: 6271318. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15337. View

5.
Kuhl A, Odunayo A, Price J, Hecht S, Marshall K, Steiner J . Comparative analysis of the effect of IV administered acid suppressants on gastric pH in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2020; 34(2):678-683. PMC: 7096616. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15718. View