Latin America: a Hub for Agrobiotechnological Innovations

Overview

Journal Ann Bot

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Oct 29

PMID 39470392

Authors

Maria Eugenia Segretin

Gabriela Cynthia Soto

Christian Damian Lorenzo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Modern biotechnology is one of the last century's major advances in human science. Particularly in the agronomical field, the landscape of crop improvement technologies has witnessed a great expansion, driven by the integration of molecular and genetic engineering methodologies into the breeding toolbox. Latin America (LATAM) serves as a pioneering region in incorporating such techniques with several countries swiftly embracing these technologies.

Scope: This review aims to give a comprehensive overview of the elements that influenced agrobiotech acceptance in LATAM countries and how such cases could provide support for upcoming technologies to be considered worldwide.

Conclusions: Nearly 50 years of biotech breakthroughs have provided humankind with an impressive portfolio of tools already integrated into several life-science areas. The agronomical field has greatly progressed thanks to technologies derived from genetically modified organisms and great promises are being made to also incorporate genome-editing products. LATAM provides a prime example of how early introduction of novelties in the crop production chain can result in improved yields, paving the way for future developments to be easily integrated into the technological ecosystem of a region. The example set by LATAM can also be useful for the present gene-editing regulatory scenario. With several countries presently on the path to approving these methods in their current crop systems, basing their next steps on the example of LATAM could represent a safe and practical pathway towards a new agronomical revolution.

References

Chen L, Liu Y . Male sterility and fertility restoration in crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013; 65:579-606. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040119. View

Andersson M, Turesson H, Olsson N, Falt A, Ohlsson P, Gonzalez M . Genome editing in potato via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery. Physiol Plant. 2018; 164(4):378-384. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12731. View

Funke T, Han H, Healy-Fried M, Fischer M, Schonbrunn E . Molecular basis for the herbicide resistance of Roundup Ready crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(35):13010-5. PMC: 1559744. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603638103. View

Bravo A, Gill S, Soberon M . Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon. 2007; 49(4):423-35. PMC: 1857359. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.022. View

Gao R, Feyissa B, Croft M, Hannoufa A . Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in the obligatory outcrossing Medicago sativa. Planta. 2018; 247(4):1043-1050. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-2866-1. View

Whelan A, Lema M . Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina. GM Crops Food. 2015; 6(4):253-65. PMC: 5033209. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1114698. View

Manavella P, Arce A, Dezar C, Bitton F, Renou J, Crespi M . Cross-talk between ethylene and drought signalling pathways is mediated by the sunflower Hahb-4 transcription factor. Plant J. 2006; 48(1):125-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02865.x. View

Uauy C . Plant Genomics: Unlocking the Genome of Wheat's Progenitor. Curr Biol. 2017; 27(20):R1122-R1124. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.051. View

Khajuria C, Ivashuta S, Wiggins E, Flagel L, Moar W, Pleau M . Development and characterization of the first dsRNA-resistant insect population from western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0197059. PMC: 5951553. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197059. View

10.

Goberna M, Whelan A, Godoy P, Lewi D . Genomic Editing: The Evolution in Regulatory Management Accompanying Scientific Progress. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:835378. PMC: 8900009. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.835378. View

11.

Venske E, Dos Santos R, Busanello C, Gustafson P, de Oliveira A . Bread wheat: a role model for plant domestication and breeding. Hereditas. 2019; 156:16. PMC: 6542105. DOI: 10.1186/s41065-019-0093-9. View

12.

Larson G, Piperno D, Allaby R, Purugganan M, Andersson L, Arroyo-Kalin M . Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(17):6139-46. PMC: 4035915. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323964111. View

13.

Chen Z, Debernardi J, Dubcovsky J, Gallavotti A . Recent advances in crop transformation technologies. Nat Plants. 2022; 8(12):1343-1351. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-022-01295-8. View

14.

Lema M . Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina. Transgenic Res. 2019; 28(Suppl 2):147-150. DOI: 10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2. View

15.

Goodman R . Twenty-eight years of GM Food and feed without harm: why not accept them?. GM Crops Food. 2024; 15(1):40-50. PMC: 10939142. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2305944. View

16.

Wu Y, Fox T, Trimnell M, Wang L, Xu R, Cigan A . Development of a novel recessive genetic male sterility system for hybrid seed production in maize and other cross-pollinating crops. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015; 14(3):1046-54. PMC: 5057354. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12477. View

17.

Beracochea V, Stritzler M, Radonic L, Bottero E, Jozefkowicz C, Darqui F . CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of SPL13 radically increases lettuce yield. Plant Cell Rep. 2022; 42(3):645-647. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-022-02952-0. View

18.

Cohen S, Chang A, Boyer H, Helling R . Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973; 70(11):3240-4. PMC: 427208. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.70.11.3240. View

19.

Perlak F, Stone T, Muskopf Y, Petersen L, Parker G, McPherson S . Genetically improved potatoes: protection from damage by Colorado potato beetles. Plant Mol Biol. 1993; 22(2):313-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF00014938. View

20.

Gaj T, Gersbach C, Barbas 3rd C . ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2013; 31(7):397-405. PMC: 3694601. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004. View