» Articles » PMID: 24757054

Current Perspectives and the Future of Domestication Studies

Abstract

It is difficult to overstate the cultural and biological impacts that the domestication of plants and animals has had on our species. Fundamental questions regarding where, when, and how many times domestication took place have been of primary interest within a wide range of academic disciplines. Within the last two decades, the advent of new archaeological and genetic techniques has revolutionized our understanding of the pattern and process of domestication and agricultural origins that led to our modern way of life. In the spring of 2011, 25 scholars with a central interest in domestication representing the fields of genetics, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and archaeology met at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center to discuss recent domestication research progress and identify challenges for the future. In this introduction to the resulting Special Feature, we present the state of the art in the field by discussing what is known about the spatial and temporal patterns of domestication, and controversies surrounding the speed, intentionality, and evolutionary aspects of the domestication process. We then highlight three key challenges for future research. We conclude by arguing that although recent progress has been impressive, the next decade will yield even more substantial insights not only into how domestication took place, but also when and where it did, and where and why it did not.

Citing Articles

Dissecting genomes of multiple yak populations: unveiling ancestry and high-altitude adaptation through whole-genome resequencing analysis.

Ahmad S, Gangwar M, Kumar A, Kumar A, Dige M, Jha G BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):214.

PMID: 40033180 PMC: 11877770. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11387-2.


Multiple Domestication Centers of the Indian Pig Population.

Desai S, Singh P, Pandey R, Mishra R, Chaubey A, Kumar A Genome Biol Evol. 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39995237 PMC: 11886846. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaf030.


Advancing the Indian cattle pangenome: characterizing non-reference sequences in Bos indicus.

Azam S, Sahu A, Pandey N, Neupane M, Van Tassell C, Rosen B J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2025; 16(1):21.

PMID: 39915889 PMC: 11804092. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-01133-1.


Local Ancestry and Adaptive Introgression in Xiangnan Cattle.

Yan H, Li J, Zhang K, Duan H, Sun A, Zhang B Biology (Basel). 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39765667 PMC: 11673051. DOI: 10.3390/biology13121000.


Genetic differentiation and precolonial Indigenous cultivation of hazelnut (, Betulaceae) in Western North America.

Armstrong C, Clemente-Carvalho R, Turner N, Wickham S, Trant A, Lemay M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(48):e2402304121.

PMID: 39556732 PMC: 11621740. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402304121.


References
1.
Lin Z, Li X, Shannon L, Yeh C, L Wang M, Bai G . Parallel domestication of the Shattering1 genes in cereals. Nat Genet. 2012; 44(6):720-4. PMC: 3532051. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2281. View

2.
Olsen K, Wendel J . A bountiful harvest: genomic insights into crop domestication phenotypes. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013; 64:47-70. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120048. View

3.
Albert F, Carlborg O, Plyusnina I, Besnier F, Hedwig D, Lautenschlager S . Genetic architecture of tameness in a rat model of animal domestication. Genetics. 2009; 182(2):541-54. PMC: 2691762. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.102186. View

4.
Vollbrecht E, Springer P, Goh L, Buckler 4th E, Martienssen R . Architecture of floral branch systems in maize and related grasses. Nature. 2005; 436(7054):1119-26. DOI: 10.1038/nature03892. View

5.
Bowles S, Choi J . Coevolution of farming and private property during the early Holocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(22):8830-5. PMC: 3670368. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212149110. View