» Articles » PMID: 39452572

Efficacy of Second-Line Biological Therapies in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis Patients with Prior Failure of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Multi-Center Study

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39452572
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of second-line biological therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with prior exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety between ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib, a current option as second-line biological therapy with different mechanisms in those patients.

Methods: This retrospective multi-center study was conducted across five institutions from 2011 to 2022. We enrolled patients with moderate to severe UC who failed anti-TNF therapy and subsequently received ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib as second-line biological therapy. The outcomes were analyzed for clinical response/remission and endoscopic improvement/remission rates after induction therapy, drug persistency, and adverse events.

Results: A total of 70 UC patients were included and grouped into ustekinumab (11 patients), vedolizumab (40 patients), and tofacitinib (19 patients) treatments. The clinical response/remission rates after induction therapy were similar between ustekinumab (90.9/81.8%), vedolizumab (92.5/65.0%), and tofacitinib (94.7/73.7%). There were no significant differences in the endoscopic improvement/remission rates between the three groups: 90.9/18.2% for ustekinumab, 72.5/12.5% for vedolizumab, and 84.2/26.3% for tofacitinib. Drug persistence was similar across the three agents ( = 0.130). Three patients of the tofacitinib group experienced adverse events (herpes zoster and hypertriglyceridemia).

Conclusions: Based on real-world data, second-line biological therapy with ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib showed comparable efficacy in patients with moderate to severe UC with prior exposure to anti-TNF therapy.

References
1.
Cameron C, Ewara E, Wilson F, Varu A, Dyrda P, Hutton B . The Importance of Considering Differences in Study Design in Network Meta-analysis: An Application Using Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Drugs for Ulcerative Colitis. Med Decis Making. 2017; 37(8):894-904. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17711933. View

2.
Sandborn W, Feagan B, Marano C, Zhang H, Strauss R, Johanns J . Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2013; 146(1):85-95. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.048. View

3.
Dai C, Huang Y, Jiang M . Combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and perspectives. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022; 114:109545. DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109545. View

4.
Wang L, Chen P, He S, Duan S, Zhang Y . Predictors and optimal management of tumor necrosis factor antagonist nonresponse in inflammatory bowel disease: A literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(29):4481-4498. PMC: 10445007. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i29.4481. View

5.
Sandborn W, Su C, Sands B, DHaens G, Vermeire S, Schreiber S . Tofacitinib as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(18):1723-1736. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606910. View