» Articles » PMID: 39451313

Leveraging Deep Learning and Generative AI for Predicting Rheological Properties and Material Compositions of 3D Printed Polyacrylamide Hydrogels

Overview
Journal Gels
Date 2024 Oct 25
PMID 39451313
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the ability to predict rheological properties and constituent composition of 3D-printed materials with appropriately trained models. However, these models are not currently available for use. In this work, we trained deep learning (DL) models to (1) predict the rheological properties, such as the storage (G') and loss (G") moduli, of 3D-printed polyacrylamide (PAA) substrates, and (2) predict the composition of materials and associated 3D printing parameters for a desired pair of G' and G". We employed a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and successfully predicted G' and G" from seven gel constituent parameters in a multivariate regression process. We used a grid-search algorithm along with 10-fold cross validation to tune the hyperparameters of the MLP, and found the R value to be 0.89. Next, we adopted two generative DL models named variational autoencoder (VAE) and conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) to learn data patterns and generate constituent compositions. With these generative models, we produced synthetic data with the same statistical distribution as the real data of actual hydrogel fabrication, which was then validated using Student's -test and an autoencoder (AE) anomaly detector. We found that none of the seven generated gel constituents were significantly different from the real data. Our trained DL models were successful in mapping the input-output relationship for the 3D-printed hydrogel substrates, which can predict multiple variables from a handful of input variables and vice versa.

References
1.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539. View

2.
Jiang G, Huang A, Cai Y, Tanase M, Sheetz M . Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through alphavbeta3 integrins and RPTPalpha. Biophys J. 2005; 90(5):1804-9. PMC: 1367329. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.072462. View

3.
Harris C, Millman K, van der Walt S, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D . Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020; 585(7825):357-362. PMC: 7759461. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. View

4.
Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant T, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D . SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 2020; 17(3):261-272. PMC: 7056644. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. View

5.
Chowdhury F, Li Y, Poh Y, Yokohama-Tamaki T, Wang N, Tanaka T . Soft substrates promote homogeneous self-renewal of embryonic stem cells via downregulating cell-matrix tractions. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12):e15655. PMC: 3001487. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015655. View