Reduced Scaling Correlated Natural Transition Orbitals for Multilevel Coupled Cluster Calculations

Overview

Journal J Phys Chem A

Publisher American Chemical Society

Specialty Chemistry

Date 2024 Oct 24

PMID 39446053

Authors

Sarai Dery Folkestad

Henrik Koch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Multilevel coupled cluster theory offers reduced scaling computation of intensive properties in systems that are too large for standard coupled cluster calculations. A significant benefit of the multilevel coupled cluster framework is the possibility of calculating intensive properties that are not tightly localized if an appropriate set of active orbitals is used. Correlated natural transition orbitals (CNTOs) are tailored to describe excitation processes. For multilevel coupled cluster singles and doubles (MLCCSD) and singles and perturbative doubles (MLCC2) calculations, the construction of CNTOs generally becomes the computational bottleneck. Here, we demonstrate how CNTOs can be obtained with operations, eliminating the -scaling steps involved in the original approach. This reduction in scaling moves the bottleneck of MLCC2 and MLCCSD calculations from the active orbital space preparation to the MLCC2 and MLCCSD equations with -scaling.

Citing Articles

Reduced Scaling Correlated Natural Transition Orbitals for Multilevel Coupled Cluster Calculations.

Folkestad S, Koch H J Phys Chem A. 2024; 128(44):9688-9694.

PMID: 39446053 PMC: 11551955. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c06271.

References

Yang J, Chan G, Manby F, Schutz M, Werner H . The orbital-specific-virtual local coupled cluster singles and doubles method. J Chem Phys. 2012; 136(14):144105. DOI: 10.1063/1.3696963. View

Subotnik J, Head-Gordon M . A local correlation model that yields intrinsically smooth potential-energy surfaces. J Chem Phys. 2005; 123(6):64108. DOI: 10.1063/1.2000252. View

Hoyvik I, Myhre R, Koch H . Correlated natural transition orbitals for core excitation energies in multilevel coupled cluster models. J Chem Phys. 2017; 146(14):144109. DOI: 10.1063/1.4979908. View

Ziolkowski M, Jansik B, Kjaergaard T, Jorgensen P . Linear scaling coupled cluster method with correlation energy based error control. J Chem Phys. 2010; 133(1):014107. DOI: 10.1063/1.3456535. View

Cardeynaels T, Paredis S, Deckers J, Brebels S, Vanderzande D, Maes W . Finding the optimal exchange-correlation functional to describe the excited state properties of push-pull organic dyes designed for thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2020; 22(28):16387-16399. DOI: 10.1039/d0cp02409k. View

Myhre R, Sanchez de Meras A, Koch H . Multi-level coupled cluster theory. J Chem Phys. 2014; 141(22):224105. DOI: 10.1063/1.4903195. View

Aquilante F, Pedersen T, Sanchez de Meras A, Koch H . Fast noniterative orbital localization for large molecules. J Chem Phys. 2006; 125(17):174101. DOI: 10.1063/1.2360264. View

Rajamalli P, Senthilkumar N, Gandeepan P, Ren-Wu C, Lin H, Cheng C . A Method for Reducing the Singlet-Triplet Energy Gaps of TADF Materials for Improving the Blue OLED Efficiency. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016; 8(40):27026-27034. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b10678. View

Reinholdt P, Kongsted J, Olsen J . Polarizable Density Embedding: A Solution to the Electron Spill-Out Problem in Multiscale Modeling. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017; 8(23):5949-5958. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02788. View

10.

Neese F, Hansen A, Liakos D . Efficient and accurate approximations to the local coupled cluster singles doubles method using a truncated pair natural orbital basis. J Chem Phys. 2009; 131(6):064103. DOI: 10.1063/1.3173827. View

11.

Folkestad S, Kjonstad E, Myhre R, Andersen J, Balbi A, Coriani S . e 1.0: An open source electronic structure program with emphasis on coupled cluster and multilevel methods. J Chem Phys. 2020; 152(18):184103. DOI: 10.1063/5.0004713. View

12.

Rolik Z, Kallay M . A general-order local coupled-cluster method based on the cluster-in-molecule approach. J Chem Phys. 2011; 135(10):104111. DOI: 10.1063/1.3632085. View

13.

Kobayashi M, Nakai H . Extension of linear-scaling divide-and-conquer-based correlation method to coupled cluster theory with singles and doubles excitations. J Chem Phys. 2008; 129(4):044103. DOI: 10.1063/1.2956490. View

14.

Fedorov D, Kitaura K . Coupled-cluster theory based upon the fragment molecular-orbital method. J Chem Phys. 2005; 123(13):134103. DOI: 10.1063/1.2007588. View

15.

Flocke N, Bartlett R . A natural linear scaling coupled-cluster method. J Chem Phys. 2005; 121(22):10935-44. DOI: 10.1063/1.1811606. View

16.

Li S, Ma J, Jiang Y . Linear scaling local correlation approach for solving the coupled cluster equations of large systems. J Comput Chem. 2002; 23(2):237-44. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10003. View

17.

Sanchez de Meras A, Koch H, Garcia Cuesta I, Boman L . Cholesky decomposition-based definition of atomic subsystems in electronic structure calculations. J Chem Phys. 2010; 132(20):204105. DOI: 10.1063/1.3431622. View

18.

Folkestad S, Koch H . Triplet Excited States with Multilevel Coupled Cluster Theory. J Chem Theory Comput. 2023; 19(22):8108-8117. PMC: 10687868. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00763. View

19.

Wesolowski T, Shedge S, Zhou X . Frozen-Density Embedding Strategy for Multilevel Simulations of Electronic Structure. Chem Rev. 2015; 115(12):5891-928. DOI: 10.1021/cr500502v. View

20.

Folkestad S, Koch H . Multilevel CC2 and CCSD Methods with Correlated Natural Transition Orbitals. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019; 16(1):179-189. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00701. View