» Articles » PMID: 39444877

Quantitative Computed Tomography Assessment of Pulmonary Function and Compensation After Lobectomy and Segmentectomy in Lung Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2024 Oct 24
PMID 39444877
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effect of different surgical methods on postoperative lung function in patients with lung cancer is still inconclusive. The main objective of this study was to compare the effects of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and segmentectomy on postoperative pulmonary function and compensatory changes in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Methods: A total of 120 patients (82 VATS lobectomy, 38 VATS segmentectomy) were assessed for demographic characteristics, baseline pulmonary function, tumor volume, T stage, and histological grade. Postoperative pulmonary function and compensatory changes [percentage of the well-aerated lung (WAL) total (or unilateral) lung volume (LV) (WAL%) and non-operated lung (NOL)] were measured at multiple time points up to 2 years. Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with WAL% decline after 1 year.

Results: Both VATS lobectomy and segmentectomy led to a decrease in pulmonary function, with no significant difference in the extent of decline between the two groups (all P>0.05). Lobectomy triggered a more pronounced compensatory response, characterized by increased ipsilateral NOL volume over time. Segmentectomy induced minimal compensatory changes and had a minimal impact on pulmonary function. Factors associated with decreased pulmonary ventilation after 1 year differed between the lobectomy and segmentectomy groups. In the lobectomy group, a higher preoperative WAL% of ipsilateral NOL [odds ratio (OR) =1.073; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.017-1.133; P=0.01] was associated with a higher risk of decline in pulmonary function, whereas in the segmentectomy group, the only influencing factor was the preoperative contralateral mean lung density (MLD) (OR =0.932; 95% CI: 0.884-0.984; P=0.01).

Conclusions: Both lobectomy and segmentectomy after lung cancer surgery result in a decrease in WAL%, with lobectomy demonstrating a stronger pulmonary compensatory capacity. The application of quantitative computed tomography (CT) has shown significant value in predicting postoperative pulmonary function preservation and compensatory changes, providing strong support for personalized surgical decision-making.

References
1.
Aberle D, Adams A, Berg C, Black W, Clapp J, Fagerstrom R . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5):395-409. PMC: 4356534. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. View

2.
Lim E, Baldwin D, Beckles M, Duffy J, Entwisle J, Faivre-Finn C . Guidelines on the radical management of patients with lung cancer. Thorax. 2010; 65 Suppl 3:iii1-27. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.145938. View

3.
Hwang Y, Kang C, Kim H, Jeon J, Park I, Kim Y . Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy on the patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 48(2):273-8. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu422. View

4.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

5.
Nomori H, Shiraishi A, Cong Y, Sugimura H, Mishima S . Differences in postoperative changes in pulmonary functions following segmentectomy compared with lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 53(3):640-647. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx357. View