» Articles » PMID: 39444014

Independent, but Still Observant-dog Breeds Selected for Functional Independence Learn Better from a Conspecific Demonstrator Than Cooperative Breeds in a Detour Task

Overview
Journal BMC Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Oct 24
PMID 39444014
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While complex dog-human coexistence has been deeply investigated, there is a relative scarcity of similar knowledge regarding dog-dog interactions. Social learning, a fundamental synchronizing mechanism between dogs and humans, was recently found to be influenced by the functional breed selection of dogs: with the cooperative breeds being more effective learners from a human demonstrator than the independent working breeds were. Here, we investigated whether these differences would also be present when dogs had to learn from another dog and how to effectively perform a detour around a transparent V-shaped obstacle. We tested dogs from 28 independent and 19 cooperative breeds in three consecutive trials. In the control groups, all dogs had to detour on their own the obstacle. In the dog demonstration groups, in trial 1, the subjects had to detour on their own, but before the next two trials, a trained dog showed them the solution.

Results: We found that the performance of the two breed groups was the same in the without demonstration groups. However, after observing the dog demonstrator, the independent dogs learned the task more successfully than the cooperative breeds did. In the case of the independent working breeds, detour latencies significantly dropped along the consecutive trials, and these dogs also showed higher rate of successful detours after observing the demonstrator dog's action than in the control group.

Conclusions: This is the first study where the consequences of functional breed selection were confirmed in a scenario that involved conspecific social learning in dogs. The results fit well to the ecologically valid framework of the evolutionary past of dog breed formation, in which cooperative breeds were selected for their interactivity with humans, whereas independent breeds often had to work together with their conspecifics.

Citing Articles

Body Awareness Does Not Need a Pedigree: Mixed-Breed Dogs Rely More on Self-Representation Than Social Learning in a Spatial Task.

Dobos P, Pongracz P Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943202 PMC: 11816050. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030432.

References
1.
Gacsi M, McGreevy P, Kara E, Miklosi A . Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behav Brain Funct. 2009; 5:31. PMC: 2731781. DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-31. View

2.
Gacsi M, Gyori B, Gyoori B, Viranyi Z, Kubinyi E, Range F . Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS One. 2009; 4(8):e6584. PMC: 2719091. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006584. View

3.
Range F, Viranyi Z . Tracking the evolutionary origins of dog-human cooperation: the "Canine Cooperation Hypothesis". Front Psychol. 2015; 5:1582. PMC: 4295532. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01582. View

4.
Morrill K, Hekman J, Li X, McClure J, Logan B, Goodman L . Ancestry-inclusive dog genomics challenges popular breed stereotypes. Science. 2022; 376(6592):eabk0639. PMC: 9675396. DOI: 10.1126/science.abk0639. View

5.
McGetrick J, Brucks D, Marshall-Pescini S, Range F . No evidence for a relationship between breed cooperativeness and inequity aversion in dogs. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0233067. PMC: 7299310. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233067. View