» Articles » PMID: 39409984

Gender-Specific Prognostic Impact of Treosulfan Levels in High-Dose Chemotherapy for Multiple Myeloma

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Oct 16
PMID 39409984
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The growing body of evidence around sexual and gender dimorphism in medicine, particularly in oncology, has highlighted differences in treatment response, outcomes, and side effects between males and females. Differences in drug metabolism, distribution, and elimination, influenced by factors like body composition and enzyme expression, contribute to these variations.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 112 multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with treosulfan and melphalan (TreoMel) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at a single academic center between January 2020 and August 2022. We assessed response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities in relation to gender and treosulfan exposure.

Results: Our analysis revealed significant gender-specific differences in treosulfan exposure. Females had higher peak levels (343.8 vs. 309.0 mg/L, = 0.0011) and area under the curve (AUC) (869.9 vs. 830.5 mg*h/L, = 0.0427) compared to males. Higher treosulfan exposure was associated with increased mortality in females but not in males. Females with treosulfan AUC > 900 mg*h/L had significantly shorter overall survival, while PFS was unaffected by treosulfan exposure.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that female patients undergoing TreoMel HDCT have higher treosulfan exposure than males and that females with higher levels are at increased risk for toxicity and adverse outcomes. These data suggest that higher treosulfan doses do not confer a benefit in terms of better outcomes for females. Therefore, exploring lower treosulfan doses for female MM patients undergoing TreoMel HDCT may be warranted to mitigate toxicity and improve outcomes.

References
1.
Beelen D, Trenschel R, Casper J, Freund M, Hilger R, Scheulen M . Dose-escalated treosulphan in combination with cyclophosphamide as a new preparative regimen for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with an increased risk for regimen-related complications. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004; 35(3):233-41. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704784. View

2.
Romanski M, Wachowiak J, Glowka F . Treosulfan Pharmacokinetics and its Variability in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Conditioning Prior to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Current State of the Art, In-Depth Analysis, and Perspectives. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018; 57(10):1255-1265. PMC: 6132445. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-018-0647-4. View

3.
Ngo L, Hee S, Lim L, Tao M, Quek R, Yap S . Prognostic factors in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma: Before and after the introduction of rituximab. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008; 49(3):462-9. DOI: 10.1080/10428190701809156. View

4.
Gillich C, Akhoundova D, Hayoz M, Aebi Y, Largiader C, Seipel K . Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Treosulfan and Melphalan in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(10). PMC: 10216371. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102699. View

5.
Bird S, Cairns D, Menzies T, Boyd K, Davies F, Cook G . Sex Differences in Multiple Myeloma Biology but not Clinical Outcomes: Results from 3894 Patients in the Myeloma XI Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021; 21(10):667-675. PMC: 8528179. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.04.013. View