» Articles » PMID: 39409434

Efficacy of Wearable Single-Lead ECG Monitoring During Exercise Stress Testing: A Comparative Study

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Oct 16
PMID 39409434
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Few comparative studies have evaluated wearable single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices and standard multi-lead ECG devices during exercise testing. This study aimed to validate the accuracy of a wearable single-lead ECG monitor for recording heart rate (HR) metrics during graded exercise tests (GXTs).

Methods: A cohort of 50 patients at a tertiary hospital underwent GXT while simultaneously being equipped with wearable single- and conventional multi-lead ECGs. The concordance between these modalities was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot analysis.

Results: The minimum and average HR readings between the devices were generally consistent. Parameters such as ventricular ectopic beats and supraventricular ectopic beats showed strong agreement. However, the agreement for the Total QRS and Maximum RR was not sufficient. HR measurements across different stages of the exercise test showed sufficient agreement. Although not statistically significant, the standard multi-lead ECG devices exhibited higher noise levels compared to the wearable single-lead ECG devices.

Conclusions: Wearable single-lead ECG devices can reliably monitor HR and detect abnormal beats across a spectrum of exercise intensities, offering a viable alternative to traditional multi-lead systems.

References
1.
Etiwy M, Akhrass Z, Gillinov L, Alashi A, Wang R, Blackburn G . Accuracy of wearable heart rate monitors in cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019; 9(3):262-271. PMC: 6603497. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.04.08. View

2.
Liu J, Yan B, Wen-Xuan Dai , Ding X, Zhang Y, Zhao N . Multi-wavelength photoplethysmography method for skin arterial pulse extraction. Biomed Opt Express. 2016; 7(10):4313-4326. PMC: 5102532. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.004313. View

3.
Ades P, Khadanga S, Savage P, Gaalema D . Enhancing participation in cardiac rehabilitation: Focus on underserved populations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022; 70:102-110. PMC: 9119375. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.01.003. View

4.
Hansen D, Abreu A, Ambrosetti M, Cornelissen V, Gevaert A, Kemps H . Exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation and beyond: why and how: a position statement from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021; 29(1):230-245. DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab007. View

5.
Beatty A, Beckie T, Dodson J, Goldstein C, Hughes J, Kraus W . A New Era in Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery: Research Gaps, Questions, Strategies, and Priorities. Circulation. 2023; 147(3):254-266. PMC: 9988237. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061046. View