» Articles » PMID: 39407949

Is an Electronic Nose Able to Predict Clinical Response Following Neoadjuvant Treatment of Rectal Cancer? A Prospective Pilot Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Oct 16
PMID 39407949
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: A watch-and-wait strategy for patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy is a valuable alternative to rectal resection. In this pilot study, we explored the use of an electronic nose to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy by analyzing breath-derived volatile organic compounds. A pilot study was performed between 2020 and 2022 on patients diagnosed with intermediate- or high-risk rectal cancer who were scheduled for neoadjuvant therapy. Breath samples were collected before and after (chemo) radiotherapy. A machine-learning model was developed to predict clinical response using curatively treated rectal cancer patients as controls. : For developing the machine-learning model, a total of 99 patients were included: 45 patients with rectal cancer and 54 controls. In the training set, the model successfully discriminated between patients with and without rectal cancer, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 and 0.65, respectively, and an accuracy of 0.72. In the test set, the model predicted partial or (near) complete response with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.64 and 0.47, respectively, and an accuracy of 0.58. The AUC of the ROC curve was 0.63. : The prediction model developed in this pilot study lacks the ability to accurately differentiate between partial and (near) complete responders with an electronic nose. Machine-learning studies demand a substantial number of patients and operate in a rapidly evolving field. Therefore, the prevalence of disease and duration of a study are crucial considerations for future research.

Citing Articles

Non-Invasive Detection of Tumors by Volatile Organic Compounds in Urine.

Hara T, Meng S, Arao Y, Saito Y, Inoue K, Alshammari A Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39857693 PMC: 11762175. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010109.

References
1.
Kort S, Brusse-Keizer M, Gerritsen J, van der Palen J . Data analysis of electronic nose technology in lung cancer: generating prediction models by means of Aethena. J Breath Res. 2017; 11(2):026006. DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa6b08. View

2.
Hanevelt J, Schoenaker I, Brohet R, Schrauwen R, Baas F, Tanis P . Alteration of the Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Pattern in Colorectal Cancer Patients after Intentional Curative Surgery-A Prospective Pilot Study. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(19). PMC: 10571749. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194785. View

3.
Phillips M, Byrnes R, Cataneo R, Chaturvedi A, Kaplan P, Libardoni M . Detection of volatile biomarkers of therapeutic radiation in breath. J Breath Res. 2013; 7(3):036002. DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/7/3/036002. View

4.
Altomare D, Di Lena M, Porcelli F, Travaglio E, Longobardi F, Tutino M . Effects of Curative Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds and Potential Implications in Clinical Follow-up. Ann Surg. 2015; 262(5):862-6. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001471. View

5.
de Boer N, de Meij T, Oort F, Ben Larbi I, Mulder C, van Bodegraven A . The scent of colorectal cancer: detection by volatile organic compound analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12(7):1085-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.005. View