» Articles » PMID: 39407259

Multi-omics Framework to Reveal the Molecular Determinants of Fermentation Performance in Wine Yeast Populations

Abstract

Background: Connecting the composition and function of industrial microbiomes is a major aspiration in microbial biotechnology. Here, we address this question in wine fermentation, a model system where the diversity and functioning of fermenting yeast species are determinant of the flavor and quality of the resulting wines.

Results: First, we surveyed yeast communities associated with grape musts collected across wine appellations, revealing the importance of environmental (i.e., biogeography) and anthropic factors (i.e., farming system) in shaping community composition and structure. Then, we assayed the fermenting yeast communities in synthetic grape must under common winemaking conditions. The dominating yeast species defines the fermentation performance and metabolite profile of the resulting wines, and it is determined by the initial fungal community composition rather than the imposed fermentation conditions. Yeast dominance also had a more pronounced impact on wine meta-transcriptome than fermentation conditions. We unveiled yeast-specific transcriptomic profiles, leveraging different molecular functioning strategies in wine fermentation environments. We further studied the orthologs responsible for metabolite production, revealing modules associated with the dominance of specific yeast species. This emphasizes the unique contributions of yeast species to wine flavor, here summarized in an array of orthologs that defines the individual contribution of yeast species to wine ecosystem functioning.

Conclusions: Our study bridges the gap between yeast community composition and wine metabolite production, providing insights to harness diverse yeast functionalities with the final aim to producing tailored high-quality wines. Video Abstract.

References
1.
Young M, Wakefield M, Smyth G, Oshlack A . Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(2):R14. PMC: 2872874. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14. View

2.
Simao F, Waterhouse R, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva E, Zdobnov E . BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(19):3210-2. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. View

3.
Garcia-Rios E, Morard M, Parts L, Liti G, Guillamon J . The genetic architecture of low-temperature adaptation in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18(1):159. PMC: 5310122. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3572-2. View

4.
Gobbi A, Acedo A, Imam N, Santini R, Ortiz-Alvarez R, Ellegaard-Jensen L . A global microbiome survey of vineyard soils highlights the microbial dimension of viticultural terroirs. Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):241. PMC: 8933554. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03202-5. View

5.
Gayevskiy V, Goddard M . Geographic delineations of yeast communities and populations associated with vines and wines in New Zealand. ISME J. 2011; 6(7):1281-90. PMC: 3379632. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.195. View