» Articles » PMID: 39404328

Cytotoxic Potencies of Zinc Oxide Nanoforms in A549 and J774 Cells

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 15
PMID 39404328
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (NPs) are used in a wide range of consumer products and in biomedical applications, resulting in an increased production of these materials with potential for exposure, thus causing human health concerns. Although there are many reports on the size-related toxicity of ZnO NPs, the toxicity of different nanoforms of this chemical, toxicity mechanisms, and potency determinants need clarification to support health risk characterization. A set of well-characterized ZnO nanoforms (e.g., uncoated ca. 30, 45, and 53 nm; coated with silicon oil, stearic acid, and (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane) were screened for in vitro cytotoxicity in two cell types, human lung epithelial cells (A549), and mouse monocyte/macrophage (J774) cells. ZnO (bulk) and ZnCl served as reference particles. Cytotoxicity was examined 24 h post-exposure by measuring CTB (viability), ATP (energy metabolism), and %LDH released (membrane integrity). Cellular oxidative stress (GSH-GSSG) and secreted proteins (targeted multiplex assay) were analyzed. Zinc oxide nanoform type-, dose-, and cell type-specific cytotoxic responses were seen, along with cellular oxidative stress. Cell-secreted protein profiles suggested ZnO NP exposure-related perturbations in signaling pathways relevant to inflammation/cell injury and corresponding biological processes, namely reactive oxygen species generation and apoptosis/necrosis, for some nanoforms, consistent with cellular oxidative stress and ATP status. The size, surface area, agglomeration state and metal contents of these ZnO nanoforms appeared to be physicochemical determinants of particle potencies. These findings warrant further research on high-content "OMICs" to validate and resolve toxicity pathways related to exposure to nanoforms to advance health risk-assessment efforts and to inform on safer materials.

References
1.
Solorio-Rodriguez S, Wu D, Boyadzhiev A, Christ C, Williams A, Halappanavar S . A Systematic Genotoxicity Assessment of a Suite of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Reveals Their DNA Damaging and Clastogenic Potential. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024; 14(9). PMC: 11085103. DOI: 10.3390/nano14090743. View

2.
Adamson I, Prieditis H, Hedgecock C, Vincent R . Zinc is the toxic factor in the lung response to an atmospheric particulate sample. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000; 166(2):111-9. DOI: 10.1006/taap.2000.8955. View

3.
Wang J, Deng X, Zhang F, Chen D, Ding W . ZnO nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress triggers apoptosis by activating JNK signaling pathway in cultured primary astrocytes. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014; 9(1):117. PMC: 3995614. DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-117. View

4.
Titma T, Shimmo R, Siigur J, Kahru A . Toxicity of antimony, copper, cobalt, manganese, titanium and zinc oxide nanoparticles for the alveolar and intestinal epithelial barrier cells in vitro. Cytotechnology. 2016; 68(6):2363-2377. PMC: 5101306. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-016-0032-9. View

5.
Yu M, Yang L, Yan L, Wang T, Wang Y, Qin Y . ZnO nanoparticles coated and stearic acid modified superhydrophobic chitosan film for self-cleaning and oil-water separation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023; 231:123293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123293. View