Phase Contrast MRI with Minimized Background Phase Errors

Overview

Journal Magn Reson Med

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Radiology

Date 2024 Oct 15

PMID 39402798

Authors

Michael Loecher

Daniel B Ennis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) is used clinically to measure velocities in the body, but systematic background phase errors caused by magnetic field imperfections corrupt the velocity measurements with offsets that limit clinical utility. This work aims to minimize systematic background phase errors in PC-MRI, thereby maximizing the accuracy of velocity measurements.

Methods: The MRI scanner's background phase errors from eddy currents and mechanical oscillations were modeled using the gradient impulse response function (GIRF). Gradient waveforms were then numerically optimized using the GIRF to create pulse sequences that minimize the background phase errors. The pulse sequences were tested in a static phantom where the predicted response could be compared directly to the measured background velocity. The optimized acquisitions were then tested in human subjects, where flow rates and background errors were compared to conventional PC-MRI.

Results: When using the GIRF-optimized gradient waveforms, the predicted background phase was within 0.6 [95% CI = -3.4, 5.4] mm/s of the measured background phase in a static phantom. Excellent agreement was seen for in vivo blood flow values (flow rate agreement = 0.96), and the background phase was reduced by 78.8 18.7%.

Conclusion: This work shows that using a GIRF to model the effects of magnetic field imperfections combined with numerically optimized gradient waveforms enables PC-MRI waveforms to be designed to produce a minimal background phase in the most time-efficient manner. The methodology could be adapted for other MRI sequences where similar magnetic field errors affect measurements.

Citing Articles

Phantom-based gradient waveform measurements with compensated variable-prephasing: Description and application to EPI at 7 T.

Scholten H, Wech T, Homolya I, Kostler H Magn Reson Med. 2025; 93(5):2209-2223.

PMID: 39834125 PMC: 11893026. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30425.

References

Reese T, Heid O, Weisskoff R, Wedeen V . Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 49(1):177-82. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10308. View

Addy N, Wu H, Nishimura D . Simple method for MR gradient system characterization and k-space trajectory estimation. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 68(1):120-9. PMC: 4048453. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23217. View

Hernando D, Hines C, Yu H, Reeder S . Addressing phase errors in fat-water imaging using a mixed magnitude/complex fitting method. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(3):638-44. PMC: 3525711. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23044. View

Giese D, Haeberlin M, Barmet C, Pruessmann K, Schaeffter T, Kozerke S . Analysis and correction of background velocity offsets in phase-contrast flow measurements using magnetic field monitoring. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(5):1294-302. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23111. View

Gatehouse P, Rolf M, Graves M, Hofman M, Totman J, Werner B . Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010; 12:5. PMC: 2818657. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-5. View

Wu Z, Kim Y, Khoo M, Nayak K . Evaluation of an independent linear model for acoustic noise on a conventional MRI scanner and implications for acoustic noise reduction. Magn Reson Med. 2013; 71(4):1613-20. PMC: 3795844. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24798. View

Magdoom K, Sarntinoranont M, Mareci T . An MRI-based switched gradient impulse response characterization method with uniform eigenmode excitation. J Magn Reson. 2020; 313:106720. PMC: 7245110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106720. View

Layton K, Kroboth S, Jia F, Littin S, Yu H, Leupold J . Pulseq: A rapid and hardware-independent pulse sequence prototyping framework. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 77(4):1544-1552. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26235. View

Loecher M, Middione M, Ennis D . A gradient optimization toolbox for general purpose time-optimal MRI gradient waveform design. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 84(6):3234-3245. PMC: 7540314. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28384. View

10.

Nussbaum J, Dietrich B, Wilm B, Pruessmann K . Thermal variation in gradient response: measurement and modeling. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 87(5):2224-2238. PMC: 9303907. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29123. View

11.

Bernstein M, Zhou X, Polzin J, King K, Ganin A, Pelc N . Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 39(2):300-8. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390218. View

12.

Walker P, Cranney G, Scheidegger M, Waseleski G, Pohost G, Yoganathan A . Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993; 3(3):521-30. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880030315. View

13.

Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, Hope M, Wieben O . 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 36(5):1015-36. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23632. View

14.

Vasanawala S, Hanneman K, Alley M, Hsiao A . Congenital heart disease assessment with 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 42(4):870-86. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24856. View

15.

Middione M, Ennis D . Chemical shift-induced phase errors in phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(2):391-401. PMC: 3396715. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24262. View

16.

Rahmer J, Mazurkewitz P, Bornert P, Nielsen T . Rapid acquisition of the 3D MRI gradient impulse response function using a simple phantom measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 82(6):2146-2159. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27902. View

17.

Azarine A, Garcon P, Stansal A, Canepa N, Angelopoulos G, Silvera S . Four-dimensional Flow MRI: Principles and Cardiovascular Applications. Radiographics. 2019; 39(3):632-648. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180091. View

18.

Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy M, Virtue P, Elad M, Pauly J . ESPIRiT--an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med. 2013; 71(3):990-1001. PMC: 4142121. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24751. View

19.

Busch J, Giese D, Kozerke S . Image-based background phase error correction in 4D flow MRI revisited. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017; 46(5):1516-1525. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25668. View

20.

Markl M, Bammer R, Alley M, Elkins C, Draney M, Barnett A . Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortions. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 50(4):791-801. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10582. View