» Articles » PMID: 39391684

Nutritional Status and Dietary Habits in Older Adults with Fixed Implant Dental Prostheses: a Case-control Study

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2024 Oct 11
PMID 39391684
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the nutritional status, nutritional risk, and dietary habits of patients treated with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed prostheses in comparison with a group of natural dentate patients.

Methods: A study group ( = 25, 8 women, mean age = 70.6 ± 7.5 years) with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed prostheses and a control group ( = 25, 13 women, mean age = 69.0 ± 5.3) with a mean of 27.7 ± 1.8 natural teeth were recruited. The nutritional status and nutritional risk of the participants were evaluated with Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition; (SCREEN-14), while the dietary habits were recorded by data from a three-day dietary record. The data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test and independent -test to evaluate the differences between the groups.

Results: The results showed that although both the groups had normal nutrition status as revealed by the MNA scores the study group showed significantly higher BMI ( = 0.005) but lower SCREEN-14 ( = 0.012) scores, than the control group. The results also showed that higher SCREEN-14 scores were significantly associated with higher odds of being in the control group, with an odds ratio of 1.159 ( = 0.024). Further, the results of the analysis of the dietary records showed that the participants in the study group consumed fewer meals ( = 0.006) and fewer varieties of food ( < 0.001), particularly fewer fruits ( = 0.011) than the control group.

Conclusion: The results indicate that people with fixed implant prostheses may be susceptible to nutritional deficiencies according to the SCREEN-14 scores compared to their natural dentate counterparts. Further, people with implant prostheses also tend to have higher BMI and consume a smaller variety of foods, especially fruits, than the natural dentate control group.

Citing Articles

Masticatory performance and masticatory behavior in individuals with eating disorders: a pilot study.

Kumar A, Munirji L, Langlet B, Bostanci N, Grigoriadis A Front Oral Health. 2024; 5:1456418.

PMID: 39641124 PMC: 11617570. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1456418.

References
1.
Mattei J, Alfonso C . Strategies for Healthy Eating Promotion and Behavioral Change Perceived as Effective by Nutrition Professionals: A Mixed-Methods Study. Front Nutr. 2020; 7:114. PMC: 7457058. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00114. View

2.
Nevill A, Metsios G . The need to redefine age- and gender-specific overweight and obese body mass index cutoff points. Nutr Diabetes. 2015; 5:e186. PMC: 4672357. DOI: 10.1038/nutd.2015.36. View

3.
Buratti S, Cappa C, Benedetti S, Giovanelli G . Influence of Cooking Conditions on Nutritional Properties and Sensory Characteristics Interpreted by E-Senses: Case-Study on Selected Vegetables. Foods. 2020; 9(5). PMC: 7278733. DOI: 10.3390/foods9050607. View

4.
Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry P . Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: The Mini Nutritional Assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev. 1996; 54(1 Pt 2):S59-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x. View

5.
Ranawana V, Monro J, Mishra S, Henry C . Degree of particle size breakdown during mastication may be a possible cause of interindividual glycemic variability. Nutr Res. 2010; 30(4):246-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2010.02.004. View