» Articles » PMID: 39390902

Nomogram to Assess the Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis After Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Global Spine J
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Oct 11
PMID 39390902
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication following lumbar spine surgery, which can lead to adverse consequences such as venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism. This study aimed to investigate whether predictors of DVT can improve clinical interventions.

Methods: The study included patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion between 2012 and 2022. In the training cohort, stepwise logistic regression, based on the Akaike information criterion minimum, was used to identify variables for constructing the nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated and validated using calibration curves, Brier scores, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, C-index, decision curve analyses (DCAs), clinical impact curves (CICs), and risk stratification analyses.

Results: A total of 9216 patients were enrolled after screening. The nomogram included seven variables: cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, body mass index, age, pedicular screw quantity, D-dimer, and hypertension. Calibration plots demonstrated favorable agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. The C-index indicated satisfactory discriminatory ability of the nomogram (0.772 for the training cohort and 0.792 for the validation cohort). Additionally, the DCA and CIC revealed that the nomogram could provide clinical benefits for patients.

Conclusions: This study successfully developed and validated a nomogram that can assess the risk of DVT following posterior lumbar fusion. The nomogram will assist surgeons in making informed clinical decisions.

References
1.
Phillippe H . Overview of venous thromboembolism. Am J Manag Care. 2018; 23(20 Suppl):S376-S382. View

2.
Klaassen Z, Wallis C, Lavallee L, Violette P . Perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in prostate cancer surgery. World J Urol. 2019; 38(3):593-600. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02705-x. View

3.
Guzman J, Iatridis J, Skovrlj B, Cutler H, Hecht A, Qureshi S . Outcomes and complications of diabetes mellitus on patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(19):1596-604. PMC: 4149698. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000482. View

4.
Bartlett M, Mauck K, Stephenson C, Ganesh R, Daniels P . Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020; 95(12):2775-2798. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.015. View

5.
Rinde L, Smabrekke B, Mathiesen E, Lochen M, Njolstad I, Hald E . Ischemic Stroke and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in the General Population: The Tromsø Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(11). PMC: 5210332. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004311. View