» Articles » PMID: 20054273

Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Prophylaxis in the Acute Care Hospital Setting (ENDORSE Survey): Findings in Surgical Patients

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2010 Jan 8
PMID 20054273
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in patients who underwent a major operation, including the use of, and factors influencing, American College of Chest Physicians-recommended types of VTE prophylaxis.

Summary Background Data: The Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting (ENDORSE) survey, conducted in 358 hospitals in 32 countries, reported that globally, more than 40% of at-risk patients do not receive VTE prophylaxis. Limited data are available regarding VTE prophylaxis practices according to surgery type and patient characteristics.

Methods: Patients aged >or=18 years undergoing major surgery were included in this prespecified subanalysis. VTE risk and use of prophylaxis were determined from hospital medical records according to the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with VTE prophylaxis use.

Results: Of the 18,461 patients in ENDORSE who had undergone major surgery, 17,084 (92.5%) were at-risk for VTE and 10,638 (62.3%) received prophylaxis. Use of prophylaxis varied according to major surgery type from 86.0% for orthopedic surgery to 53.8% in urologic/gynecologic and 53.6% in other procedures. Major orthopedic surgery was most strongly associated with prophylaxis use (hip replacement: odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-7.6; knee replacement: odds ratio 5.9, 95% CI 4.6-7.8).

Conclusions: The majority of surgical patients are at high-risk for VTE. Despite long-standing recognition of the high-risk for VTE in surgical patients, thromboprophylaxis remains underutilized.

Citing Articles

Nomogram to Assess the Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis After Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Study.

Li X, Ma J, Xue L, Wang L, Jiao G, Chen Y Global Spine J. 2024; :21925682241289119.

PMID: 39390902 PMC: 11559926. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241289119.


Postoperative Timing of Chemoprophylaxis and Its Impact on Thromboembolism and Bleeding Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

World J Surg. 2023; 47(5):1174-1183.

PMID: 36806555 PMC: 10070293. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06899-5.


Time trends in the incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following colorectal resection by indication and operative technique.

Lewis-Lloyd C, Crooks C, West J, Peacock O, Humes D Colorectal Dis. 2022; 24(11):1405-1415.

PMID: 35733416 PMC: 9796069. DOI: 10.1111/codi.16233.


Evaluation of risk stratification and adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among hospitalized obstetric women: Retrospective case file review at East Jeddah Hospital during 2018-2019.

Mattar G, Al Sahafi N, Al Hazmi L, Al Hazmi N, Abozeid H, Sultan I Ann Thorac Med. 2022; 17(2):94-101.

PMID: 35651894 PMC: 9150665. DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_79_21.


Using Predictive Modeling and Supervised Machine Learning to Identify Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

Wang K, Ikwuezunma I, Puvanesarajah V, Babu J, Margalit A, Raad M Global Spine J. 2021; 13(4):1097-1103.

PMID: 34036817 PMC: 10189318. DOI: 10.1177/21925682211019361.